NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A vs AMD Radeon HD 7950

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A and AMD Radeon HD 7950 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• 4x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 300 Watt
• 4x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1250 MHz
• Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5834 vs 3699
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7859 vs 3359
• Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5834 vs 3699
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7859 vs 3359

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7950

• Around 15% higher boost clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 1085 MHz
• 2.1x more texture fill rate: 89.6 GTexel / s vs 43.4 GTexel / s
• 2.8x more pipelines: 1792 vs 640
• 2.1x better floating-point performance: 2,867 gflops vs 1,389 gflops
• Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 2 GB
• 6.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 82144 vs 12495
• Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 63.74 vs 49.772
• Around 55% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1177.395 vs 757.295
• Around 55% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.685 vs 3.67
• Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 69.23 vs 49.875
• Around 91% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 343.81 vs 179.567
• Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7988 vs 5157
• Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7988 vs 5157

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7950

Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	12495 82144
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	49.772 63.74
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	757.295 1177.395
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.67 5.685
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	49.875 69.23
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	179.567 343.81
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5157 7988
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5834 3699
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7859 3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5157 7988
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5834 3699
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7859 3359

Compare specifications (specs)