NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 11% higher pipelines: 1280 vs 1152
- Around 12% better floating-point performance: 2,657 gflops vs 2,378 gflops
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 81 Watt vs 170 Watt
- 3x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5699 vs 4799
- Around 33% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 19029 vs 14283
- Around 58% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 59.428 vs 37.505
- Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1113.788 vs 864.402
- Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.157 vs 3.09
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8546 vs 6927
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8546 vs 6927
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 7 October 2014 vs 25 June 2013 |
| Boost clock speed | 1038 MHz vs 1033 MHz |
| Pipelines | 1280 vs 1152 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,657 gflops vs 2,378 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 81 Watt vs 170 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5699 vs 4799 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 19029 vs 14283 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 59.428 vs 37.505 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1113.788 vs 864.402 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.157 vs 3.09 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8546 vs 6927 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8546 vs 6927 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
- Around 6% higher core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 924 MHz
- Around 13% higher texture fill rate: 94.1 billion / sec vs 83.04 GTexel / s
- 2.4x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 2500 MHz
- Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 530 vs 380
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 40.457 vs 39.101
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 84.186 vs 81.909
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 3699
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 3699
- 5.5x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1659 vs 303
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 980 MHz vs 924 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 94.1 billion / sec vs 83.04 GTexel / s |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 2500 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 530 vs 380 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.457 vs 39.101 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 84.186 vs 81.909 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3342 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3342 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1659 vs 303 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5699 | 4799 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 380 | 530 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 19029 | 14283 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 59.428 | 37.505 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1113.788 | 864.402 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.157 | 3.09 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 39.101 | 40.457 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 81.909 | 84.186 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8546 | 6927 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3699 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3342 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8546 | 6927 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3699 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3342 | 3357 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 303 | 1659 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | GM204 | GK104 |
| Launch date | 7 October 2014 | 25 June 2013 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2,560.89 | $249 |
| Place in performance rating | 584 | 587 |
| Price now | $1,899 | $249.99 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 3.99 | 23.69 |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1038 MHz | 1033 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 924 MHz | 980 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 1280 | 1152 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,657 gflops | 2,378 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 1152 |
| Texture fill rate | 83.04 GTexel / s | 94.1 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 81 Watt | 170 Watt |
| Transistor count | 5,200 million | 3,540 million |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | 1 | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA аnalog display support | 1 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| HDCP | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| SLI options | 1 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | Two 6-pin |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | |
| Minimum recommended system power | 500 Watt | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 120 GB / s | 192.2 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz | 6008 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| Ansel | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DSR | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| FXAA | ||
| PhysX | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 970M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 970M vs
AMDRadeon R9 M290X
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 970M vs
AMDRadeon HD 8530M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 970M vs
NVIDIANVS 810
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 970M vs
NVIDIAQuadro M2000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 970M vs
NVIDIAQuadro M620 Mobile
