NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti vs Intel HD Graphics 4600

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti and Intel HD Graphics 4600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• 2.5x more core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 400 MHz
• 35.2x more texture fill rate: 176 billion / sec vs 5 GTexel / s
• 140.8x more pipelines: 2816 vs 20
• 121.2x better floating-point performance: 6,060 gflops vs 50 gflops
• 22x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13812 vs 629
• 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 855 vs 315
• 11.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 37788 vs 3229
• 16.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 145.843 vs 8.844
• 10.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1722.98 vs 171.17
• 10.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 11.661 vs 1.115
• 3.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 37.16 vs 10.385
• 63.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 788.464 vs 12.361
• 10.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10471 vs 988
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3695 vs 1702
• Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3338 vs 2808
• 10.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10471 vs 988
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3695 vs 1702
• Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3338 vs 2808
• 29.7x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5757 vs 194

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4600

• Around 16% higher boost clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 1075 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 28 nm
• 5.6x lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 250 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4600

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	13812 629
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	855 315
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	37788 3229
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	145.843 8.844
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1722.98 171.17
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11.661 1.115
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	37.16 10.385
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	788.464 12.361
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10471 988
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3695 1702
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3338 2808
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10471 988
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3695 1702
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3338 2808
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	5757 194

Compare specifications (specs)