NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 vs NVIDIA Tesla K20m
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 and NVIDIA Tesla K20m videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 41% better floating-point performance: 4,981 gflops vs 3,524 gflops
- Around 36% lower typical power consumption: 165 Watt vs 225 Watt
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11112 vs 4432
- 3.8x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 791 vs 210
- 2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 34898 vs 16085
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 110.006 vs 54.89
- Around 73% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 9.194 vs 5.303
- Around 91% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 477.015 vs 250.291
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9566 vs 8319
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9566 vs 8319
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 19 September 2014 vs 5 January 2013 |
Floating-point performance | 4,981 gflops vs 3,524 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 165 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11112 vs 4432 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 791 vs 210 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 34898 vs 16085 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 110.006 vs 54.89 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.194 vs 5.303 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 477.015 vs 250.291 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9566 vs 8319 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9566 vs 8319 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K20m
- Around 2% higher texture fill rate: 146.8 GTexel / s vs 144 billion / sec
- Around 22% higher pipelines: 2496 vs 2048
- Around 25% higher maximum memory size: 5 GB vs 4 GB
- 742.9x more memory clock speed: 5200 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
- Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1414.755 vs 1348.307
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 83.807 vs 37.443
- Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7337 vs 3690
- 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 10873 vs 3335
- Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7337 vs 3690
- 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 10873 vs 3335
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 146.8 GTexel / s vs 144 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 2496 vs 2048 |
Maximum memory size | 5 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1414.755 vs 1348.307 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 83.807 vs 37.443 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7337 vs 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 10873 vs 3335 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7337 vs 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 10873 vs 3335 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla K20m
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 | NVIDIA Tesla K20m |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11112 | 4432 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 791 | 210 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 34898 | 16085 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 110.006 | 54.89 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1348.307 | 1414.755 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.194 | 5.303 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.443 | 83.807 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 477.015 | 250.291 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9566 | 8319 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3690 | 7337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3335 | 10873 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9566 | 8319 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3690 | 7337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3335 | 10873 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 474 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 | NVIDIA Tesla K20m | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Kepler |
Code name | GM204 | GK110 |
Launch date | 19 September 2014 | 5 January 2013 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $549 | $3,199 |
Place in performance rating | 379 | 414 |
Price now | $605.06 | |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 21.18 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1216 MHz | |
CUDA cores | 2048 | |
Floating-point performance | 4,981 gflops | 3,524 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2048 | 2496 |
Texture fill rate | 144 billion / sec | 146.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 165 Watt | 225 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 7,080 million |
Core clock speed | 706 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 | No outputs |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | 1 | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
VGA аnalog display support | 1 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | 267 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
SLI options | 1 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pins | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 5 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 224 GB / s | 208.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 320 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7.0 GB/s | 5200 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive Vertical Sync | ||
BatteryBoost | ||
CUDA | ||
GameStream | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus | ||
SLI | ||
Surround |