NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 versus NVIDIA Tesla K20m
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 and NVIDIA Tesla K20m pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 8 mois plus tard
- Environ 41% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 4,981 gflops versus 3,524 gflops
- Environ 36% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 165 Watt versus 225 Watt
- 2.5x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 11112 versus 4432
- 3.8x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 791 versus 210
- 2.2x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 34898 versus 16085
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 110.006 versus 54.89
- Environ 73% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 9.194 versus 5.303
- Environ 91% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 477.015 versus 250.291
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9566 versus 8319
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9566 versus 8319
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 19 September 2014 versus 5 January 2013 |
Performance á point flottant | 4,981 gflops versus 3,524 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 165 Watt versus 225 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11112 versus 4432 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 791 versus 210 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 34898 versus 16085 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 110.006 versus 54.89 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.194 versus 5.303 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 477.015 versus 250.291 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9566 versus 8319 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9566 versus 8319 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Tesla K20m
- Environ 2% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 146.8 GTexel / s versus 144 billion / sec
- Environ 22% de pipelines plus haut: 2496 versus 2048
- Environ 25% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 5 GB versus 4 GB
- 742.9x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5200 MHz versus 7.0 GB/s
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1414.755 versus 1348.307
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 83.807 versus 37.443
- Environ 99% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7337 versus 3690
- 3.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 10873 versus 3335
- Environ 99% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7337 versus 3690
- 3.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 10873 versus 3335
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 146.8 GTexel / s versus 144 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 2496 versus 2048 |
Taille de mémore maximale | 5 GB versus 4 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5200 MHz versus 7.0 GB/s |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1414.755 versus 1348.307 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 83.807 versus 37.443 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7337 versus 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 10873 versus 3335 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7337 versus 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 10873 versus 3335 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla K20m
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 | NVIDIA Tesla K20m |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11112 | 4432 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 791 | 210 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 34898 | 16085 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 110.006 | 54.89 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1348.307 | 1414.755 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.194 | 5.303 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.443 | 83.807 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 477.015 | 250.291 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9566 | 8319 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3690 | 7337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3335 | 10873 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9566 | 8319 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3690 | 7337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3335 | 10873 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 474 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 | NVIDIA Tesla K20m | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Kepler |
Nom de code | GM204 | GK110 |
Date de sortie | 19 September 2014 | 5 January 2013 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $549 | $3,199 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 379 | 414 |
Prix maintenant | $605.06 | |
Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 21.18 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1216 MHz | |
Noyaux CUDA | 2048 | |
Performance á point flottant | 4,981 gflops | 3,524 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2048 | 2496 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 144 billion / sec | 146.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 165 Watt | 225 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 5,200 million | 7,080 million |
Vitesse du noyau | 706 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 | No outputs |
Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | 1 | |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | 1 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | 267 mm |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
Options SLI | 1 | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 6-pins | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 5 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 224 GB / s | 208.0 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 320 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7.0 GB/s | 5200 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive Vertical Sync | ||
BatteryBoost | ||
CUDA | ||
GameStream | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus | ||
SLI | ||
Surround |