NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN vs ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN and ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 20% higher core clock speed: 837 MHz vs 700 MHz
- Around 68% higher pipelines: 2688 vs 2x 800
- 2.1x better floating-point performance: 4,709 gflops vs 2x 1,120.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- Around 14% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 286 Watt
- 3x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 2x 1 GB
- 6.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8190 vs 1309
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 630 vs 565
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 3323
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 3323
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 19 February 2013 vs 12 August 2008 |
| Core clock speed | 837 MHz vs 700 MHz |
| Pipelines | 2688 vs 2x 800 |
| Floating-point performance | 4,709 gflops vs 2x 1,120.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt vs 286 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 2x 1 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8190 vs 1309 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 630 vs 565 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3323 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3323 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2
- Around 22% higher texture fill rate: 2x 28 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 187.5 billion / sec
- 600x more memory clock speed: 3600 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
| Texture fill rate | 2x 28 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 187.5 billion / sec |
| Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN | ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8190 | 1309 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 630 | 565 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 24431 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 62.027 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1218.137 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.835 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 36.842 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 215.546 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10176 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3323 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10176 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3323 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2901 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN | ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale |
| Code name | GK110 | R700 |
| Launch date | 19 February 2013 | 12 August 2008 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | $550 |
| Place in performance rating | 438 | 440 |
| Price now | $2,054.59 | |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 5.09 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 876 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 837 MHz | 700 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 2688 | |
| Floating-point performance | 4,709 gflops | 2x 1,120.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Pipelines | 2688 | 2x 800 |
| Texture fill rate | 187.5 billion / sec | 2x 28 GTexel / s billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 286 Watt |
| Transistor count | 7,080 million | 956 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | 267 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | One 8-pin and one 6-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 2x 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 288.4 GB / s | 2x 115.2 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 384-bit GDDR5 | 2x 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6.0 GB/s | 3600 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN vs
ATIRadeon HD 4870 X2
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN vs
AMDFirePro S10000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN vs
AMDRadeon Pro WX 4170 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN vs
AMDRadeon Pro 570
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN vs
NVIDIAP106-100
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN vs
IntelArc A550M
