NVIDIA GeForce MX110 vs ATI Radeon HD 5870
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX110 and ATI Radeon HD 5870 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX110
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 14% higher core clock speed: 965 MHz vs 850 MHz
- Around 17% higher boost clock speed: 993 MHz vs 850 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 6.3x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 188 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 4% higher memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 4800 MHz
- 2.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4256 vs 1858
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 17 November 2017 vs 23 September 2009 |
Core clock speed | 965 MHz vs 850 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 993 MHz vs 850 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 188 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 4800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4256 vs 1858 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 vs 3349 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 vs 3349 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5870
- 2.9x more texture fill rate: 68.0 GTexel / s vs 23.83 GTexel / s
- 6.3x more pipelines: 1600 vs 256
- 3.6x better floating-point performance: 2,720.0 gflops vs 762.6 gflops
- Around 55% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2199 vs 1417
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 416 vs 189
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4541 vs 2197
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4541 vs 2197
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3671 vs 3502
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3671 vs 3502
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 68.0 GTexel / s vs 23.83 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1600 vs 256 |
Floating-point performance | 2,720.0 gflops vs 762.6 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2199 vs 1417 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 416 vs 189 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4541 vs 2197 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4541 vs 2197 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3671 vs 3502 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3671 vs 3502 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX110
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5870
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX110 | ATI Radeon HD 5870 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1417 | 2199 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 189 | 416 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4256 | 1858 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2197 | 4541 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2197 | 4541 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3502 | 3671 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3502 | 3671 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 3349 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 3349 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.789 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1339.688 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.775 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 43.496 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 245.813 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce MX110 | ATI Radeon HD 5870 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | GM108 | Cypress |
Launch date | 17 November 2017 | 23 September 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 891 | 770 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Design | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 993 MHz | 850 MHz |
Core clock speed | 965 MHz | 850 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 762.6 gflops | 2,720.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 256 | 1600 |
Texture fill rate | 23.83 GTexel / s | 68.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 188 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,154 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
Length | 282 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 40.1 GB / s | 153.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 4800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 / DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
Optimus | ||
Verde Drivers | ||
AMD Eyefinity |