NVIDIA GeForce MX110 vs NVIDIA GeForce 210

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX110 and NVIDIA GeForce 210 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX110

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 1 month(s) later
  • 5.7x more texture fill rate: 23.83 GTexel / s vs 4.16 GTexel / s
  • 16x more pipelines: 256 vs 16
  • 19.4x better floating-point performance: 762.6 gflops vs 39.36 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
  • Around 3% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 30.5 Watt
  • 4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
  • 10x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 500 MHz
  • 11.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1417 vs 126
  • 6.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 189 vs 30
  • Around 75% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4256 vs 2438
  • 7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3502 vs 497
  • 7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3502 vs 497
  • 4.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 vs 688
  • 4.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 vs 688
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 17 November 2017 vs 12 October 2009
Texture fill rate 23.83 GTexel / s vs 4.16 GTexel / s
Pipelines 256 vs 16
Floating-point performance 762.6 gflops vs 39.36 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 30 Watt vs 30.5 Watt
Maximum memory size 2 GB vs 512 MB
Memory clock speed 5012 MHz vs 500 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 1417 vs 126
PassMark - G2D Mark 189 vs 30
Geekbench - OpenCL 4256 vs 2438
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3502 vs 497
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3502 vs 497
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3352 vs 688
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3352 vs 688

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 210

  • Around 45% higher core clock speed: 1402 MHz vs 965 MHz
Core clock speed 1402 MHz vs 965 MHz

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX110
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 210

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1417
126
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
189
30
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
4256
2438
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3502
497
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3502
497
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3352
688
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3352
688
Name NVIDIA GeForce MX110 NVIDIA GeForce 210
PassMark - G3D Mark 1417 126
PassMark - G2D Mark 189 30
Geekbench - OpenCL 4256 2438
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2197
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2197
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3502 497
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3502 497
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3352 688
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3352 688

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce MX110 NVIDIA GeForce 210

Essentials

Architecture Maxwell Tesla 2.0
Code name GM108 GT218
Launch date 17 November 2017 12 October 2009
Place in performance rating 891 1674
Type Laptop Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $29.49
Price now $32.99
Value for money (0-100) 6.81

Technical info

Boost clock speed 993 MHz
Core clock speed 965 MHz 1402 MHz
Floating-point performance 762.6 gflops 39.36 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 256 16
Texture fill rate 23.83 GTexel / s 4.16 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 30 Watt 30.5 Watt
CUDA cores 16
Maximum GPU temperature 105 °C
Transistor count 260 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA, DVIVGADisplayPort
Audio input for HDMI Internal
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536
Multi monitor support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None None
Bus support PCI-E 2.0
Height 2.731" (6.9 cm)
Length 6.60" (16.8 cm)

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 10.1
OpenGL 4.6 3.1

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 512 MB
Memory bandwidth 40.1 GB / s 8.0 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 5012 MHz 500 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 / DDR3 GDDR2
Shared memory 0

Technologies

3D Vision
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
CUDA
GameWorks
Optimus
Verde Drivers