NVIDIA GeForce MX110 vs NVIDIA GeForce 810M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX110 and NVIDIA GeForce 810M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s).

NVIDIA GeForce MX110

NVIDIA GeForce 810M

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX110

Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 7 month(s) later
Around 31% higher core clock speed: 965 MHz vs 738 MHz
4x more texture fill rate: 23.83 GTexel / s vs 5.904 GTexel / s
5.3x more pipelines: 256 vs 48
5.4x better floating-point performance: 762.6 gflops vs 141.7 gflops
Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 45 Watt
2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
2.8x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1800 MHz
3.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1417 vs 418
2.9x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 189 vs 66
2.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4256 vs 1607
2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2197 vs 1076
2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2197 vs 1076
Around 91% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3502 vs 1833
Around 91% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3502 vs 1833
Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 vs 3035
Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 vs 3035

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	17 November 2017 vs 24 March 2014
Core clock speed	965 MHz vs 738 MHz
Texture fill rate	23.83 GTexel / s vs 5.904 GTexel / s
Pipelines	256 vs 48
Floating-point performance	762.6 gflops vs 141.7 gflops
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	30 Watt vs 45 Watt
Maximum memory size	2 GB vs 1 GB
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz vs 1800 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	1417 vs 418
PassMark - G2D Mark	189 vs 66
Geekbench - OpenCL	4256 vs 1607
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2197 vs 1076
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2197 vs 1076
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3502 vs 1833
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3502 vs 1833
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3352 vs 3035
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3352 vs 3035

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX110
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 810M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1417

418

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

189

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

4256

1607

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2197

1076

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2197

1076

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3502

1833

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3502

1833

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3352

3035

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3352

3035

Name	NVIDIA GeForce MX110	NVIDIA GeForce 810M
PassMark - G3D Mark	1417	418
PassMark - G2D Mark	189	66
Geekbench - OpenCL	4256	1607
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2197	1076
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2197	1076
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3502	1833
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3502	1833
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3352	3035
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3352	3035
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		4.403
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		131.239

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce MX110	NVIDIA GeForce 810M
Essentials
Architecture	Maxwell	Fermi 2.0
Code name	GM108	GF117
Launch date	17 November 2017	24 March 2014
Place in performance rating	891	1437
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	993 MHz
Core clock speed	965 MHz	738 MHz
Floating-point performance	762.6 gflops	141.7 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	256	48
Texture fill rate	23.83 GTexel / s	5.904 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	30 Watt	45 Watt
Transistor count		585 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	1 GB
Memory bandwidth	40.1 GB / s	14.4 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz	1800 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5 / DDR3	DDR3
Shared memory	0
Technologies
3D Vision
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
CUDA
GameWorks
Optimus
Verde Drivers