NVIDIA GeForce MX110 vs NVIDIA GeForce 820M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX110 and NVIDIA GeForce 820M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX110
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 19% higher core clock speed: 965 MHz vs 810 MHz
- 2.4x more texture fill rate: 23.83 GTexel / s vs 10 GTexel / s
- 2.7x more pipelines: 256 vs 96
- 3.2x better floating-point performance: 762.6 gflops vs 240.0 gflops
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 45 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- 2.8x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1802 MHz
- 2.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1417 vs 490
- Around 66% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 189 vs 114
- Around 53% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4256 vs 2789
- Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2197 vs 1195
- Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2197 vs 1195
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3502 vs 1447
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3502 vs 1447
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 17 November 2017 vs 21 March 2015 |
Core clock speed | 965 MHz vs 810 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 23.83 GTexel / s vs 10 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 256 vs 96 |
Floating-point performance | 762.6 gflops vs 240.0 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 45 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 1802 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1417 vs 490 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 189 vs 114 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4256 vs 2789 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2197 vs 1195 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2197 vs 1195 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3502 vs 1447 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3502 vs 1447 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 vs 3349 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 vs 3349 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX110
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 820M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX110 | NVIDIA GeForce 820M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1417 | 490 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 189 | 114 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4256 | 2789 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2197 | 1195 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2197 | 1195 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3502 | 1447 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3502 | 1447 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 3349 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 3349 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.765 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 161.305 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.686 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 14.257 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 22.768 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 847 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce MX110 | NVIDIA GeForce 820M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
Code name | GM108 | GK107 |
Launch date | 17 November 2017 | 21 March 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 891 | 1444 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 993 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 965 MHz | 810 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 762.6 gflops | 240.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 256 | 96 |
Texture fill rate | 23.83 GTexel / s | 10 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 45 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 40.1 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 1802 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 / DDR3 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
Optimus | ||
Verde Drivers | ||
GPU Boost |