NVIDIA GeForce MX110 vs NVIDIA GeForce 820M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX110 and NVIDIA GeForce 820M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX110

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
  • Around 19% higher core clock speed: 965 MHz vs 810 MHz
  • 2.4x more texture fill rate: 23.83 GTexel / s vs 10 GTexel / s
  • 2.7x more pipelines: 256 vs 96
  • 3.2x better floating-point performance: 762.6 gflops vs 240.0 gflops
  • Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 45 Watt
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
  • 2.8x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1802 MHz
  • 2.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1417 vs 490
  • Around 66% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 189 vs 114
  • Around 53% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4256 vs 2789
  • Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2197 vs 1195
  • Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2197 vs 1195
  • 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3502 vs 1447
  • 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3502 vs 1447
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 17 November 2017 vs 21 March 2015
Core clock speed 965 MHz vs 810 MHz
Texture fill rate 23.83 GTexel / s vs 10 GTexel / s
Pipelines 256 vs 96
Floating-point performance 762.6 gflops vs 240.0 gflops
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 30 Watt vs 45 Watt
Maximum memory size 2 GB vs 1 GB
Memory clock speed 5012 MHz vs 1802 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 1417 vs 490
PassMark - G2D Mark 189 vs 114
Geekbench - OpenCL 4256 vs 2789
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2197 vs 1195
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2197 vs 1195
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3502 vs 1447
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3502 vs 1447
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3352 vs 3349
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3352 vs 3349

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX110
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 820M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1417
490
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
189
114
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
4256
2789
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2197
1195
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2197
1195
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3502
1447
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3502
1447
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3352
3349
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3352
3349
Name NVIDIA GeForce MX110 NVIDIA GeForce 820M
PassMark - G3D Mark 1417 490
PassMark - G2D Mark 189 114
Geekbench - OpenCL 4256 2789
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2197 1195
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2197 1195
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3502 1447
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3502 1447
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3352 3349
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3352 3349
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 7.765
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 161.305
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.686
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 14.257
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 22.768
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 847

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce MX110 NVIDIA GeForce 820M

Essentials

Architecture Maxwell Kepler
Code name GM108 GK107
Launch date 17 November 2017 21 March 2015
Place in performance rating 891 1444
Type Laptop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 993 MHz
Core clock speed 965 MHz 810 MHz
Floating-point performance 762.6 gflops 240.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 256 96
Texture fill rate 23.83 GTexel / s 10 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 30 Watt 45 Watt
Transistor count 1,270 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None
Bus support PCI Express 2.0

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.6 4.5

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 40.1 GB / s 14.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 5012 MHz 1802 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 / DDR3 DDR3
Shared memory 0 0

Technologies

3D Vision
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
CUDA
GameWorks
Optimus
Verde Drivers
GPU Boost