NVIDIA GeForce MX110 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX110 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX110

• Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 10 month(s) later
• Around 7% higher pipelines: 256 vs 240
• Around 13% better floating-point performance: 762.6 gflops vs 673.9 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
• 7.3x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 219 Watt
• 2.3x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 896 MB
• 4.4x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1134 MHz
• Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1417 vs 1378
• 3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 189 vs 63
• Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 vs 3195
• Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 vs 3195

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275

• Around 45% higher core clock speed: 1404 MHz vs 965 MHz
• 2.1x more texture fill rate: 50.6 billion / sec vs 23.83 GTexel / s
• 5.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 23256 vs 4256

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX110
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1417 1378
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	189 63
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4256 23256
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3352 3195
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3352 3195

Compare specifications (specs)