NVIDIA GeForce MX110 vs NVIDIA Quadro K1100M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX110 and NVIDIA Quadro K1100M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX110
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 37% higher core clock speed: 965 MHz vs 706 MHz
- Around 5% higher texture fill rate: 23.83 GTexel / s vs 22.59 GTexel / s
- Around 41% better floating-point performance: 762.6 gflops vs 542.2 gflops
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 45 Watt
- Around 79% higher memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 2800 MHz
- Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1417 vs 1088
- Around 38% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4256 vs 3074
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2197 vs 1892
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2197 vs 1892
- 4.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3502 vs 861
- 4.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3502 vs 861
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 vs 1443
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 vs 1443
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 17 November 2017 vs 23 July 2013 |
Core clock speed | 965 MHz vs 706 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 23.83 GTexel / s vs 22.59 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 762.6 gflops vs 542.2 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 45 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 2800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1417 vs 1088 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4256 vs 3074 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2197 vs 1892 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2197 vs 1892 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3502 vs 861 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3502 vs 861 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 vs 1443 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 vs 1443 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K1100M
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 384 vs 256
- Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 253 vs 189
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 384 vs 256 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 253 vs 189 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX110
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K1100M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX110 | NVIDIA Quadro K1100M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1417 | 1088 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 189 | 253 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4256 | 3074 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2197 | 1892 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2197 | 1892 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3502 | 861 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3502 | 861 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 1443 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 1443 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.649 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 174.555 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.642 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.732 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 16.3 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce MX110 | NVIDIA Quadro K1100M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
Code name | GM108 | GK107 |
Launch date | 17 November 2017 | 23 July 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 891 | 1447 |
Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $109.94 | |
Price now | $79 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 17.59 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 993 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 965 MHz | 706 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 762.6 gflops | 542.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 256 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 23.83 GTexel / s | 22.59 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 45 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 40.1 GB / s | 44.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 2800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 / DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
Optimus | ||
Verde Drivers | ||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management |