NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs AMD Radeon R9 M375X
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX250 and AMD Radeon R9 M375X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX250
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 1% higher core clock speed: 937 MHz vs 925 MHz
- Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1038 MHz vs 1015 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 5.3x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 1125 MHz
- Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2394 vs 1769
- Around 13% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9268 vs 8221
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4027 vs 3548
- 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 vs 1333
- Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 2185
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4027 vs 3548
- 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 vs 1333
- Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 2185
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 21 February 2019 vs 5 May 2015 |
Core clock speed | 937 MHz vs 925 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1038 MHz vs 1015 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 1125 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2394 vs 1769 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9268 vs 8221 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4027 vs 3548 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 vs 1333 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 2185 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4027 vs 3548 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 vs 1333 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 2185 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M375X
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 640 vs 384
- Around 41% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 337 vs 239
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 640 vs 384 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 337 vs 239 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX250
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M375X
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX250 | AMD Radeon R9 M375X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2394 | 1769 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 239 | 337 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9268 | 8221 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.992 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 535.24 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.64 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.7 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 141.816 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4027 | 3548 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 | 1333 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 2185 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4027 | 3548 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 | 1333 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 2185 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 888 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce MX250 | AMD Radeon R9 M375X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GP108B | Tropo |
Launch date | 21 February 2019 | 5 May 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 887 | 890 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1038 MHz | 1015 MHz |
Core clock speed | 937 MHz | 925 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 640 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | |
Transistor count | 1,800 million | 1,500 million |
Compute units | 10 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,299 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 40.6 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Eyefinity | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 bit |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 1125 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB / s | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
ZeroCore |