NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX250 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX250

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 11 month(s) later
  • Around 18% higher core clock speed: 937 MHz vs 797 MHz
  • Around 13% higher boost clock speed: 1038 MHz vs 915 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • 7.5x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 75 Watt
  • Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 240 vs 225
  • 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 46.992 vs 22.828
  • 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 535.24 vs 210.585
  • Around 56% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 44.7 vs 28.662
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 vs 3684
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 3340
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 vs 3684
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 3340
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 21 February 2019 vs 10 March 2014
Core clock speed 937 MHz vs 797 MHz
Boost clock speed 1038 MHz vs 915 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 10 Watt vs 75 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 240 vs 225
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 46.992 vs 22.828
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 535.24 vs 210.585
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 44.7 vs 28.662
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3710 vs 3684
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3357 vs 3340
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3710 vs 3684
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3357 vs 3340

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M

  • Around 67% higher pipelines: 640 vs 384
  • Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3047 vs 2412
  • Around 12% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10305 vs 9236
  • Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.416 vs 2.64
  • Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 162.83 vs 141.816
  • Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4938 vs 4027
  • Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4938 vs 4027
  • Around 30% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1151 vs 888
Specifications (specs)
Pipelines 640 vs 384
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 3047 vs 2412
Geekbench - OpenCL 10305 vs 9236
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.416 vs 2.64
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 162.83 vs 141.816
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 4938 vs 4027
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 4938 vs 4027
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 1151 vs 888

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX250
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
2412
3047
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
240
225
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
9236
10305
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
46.992
22.828
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
535.24
210.585
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2.64
3.416
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
44.7
28.662
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
141.816
162.83
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
4027
4938
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3710
3684
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3357
3340
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
4027
4938
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3710
3684
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3357
3340
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score
GPU 1
GPU 2
888
1151
Name NVIDIA GeForce MX250 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M
PassMark - G3D Mark 2412 3047
PassMark - G2D Mark 240 225
Geekbench - OpenCL 9236 10305
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 46.992 22.828
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 535.24 210.585
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 2.64 3.416
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 44.7 28.662
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 141.816 162.83
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 4027 4938
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3710 3684
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3357 3340
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 4027 4938
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3710 3684
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3357 3340
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 888 1151

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce MX250 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M

Essentials

Architecture Pascal Kepler
Code name GP108B GK104
Launch date 21 February 2019 10 March 2014
Place in performance rating 902 904
Type Laptop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1038 MHz 915 MHz
Core clock speed 937 MHz 797 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 384 640
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 10 Watt 75 Watt
Transistor count 1,800 million 3,540 million
CUDA cores 1152 or 640
Floating-point performance 1,389 gflops
Texture fill rate 43.4 GTexel / s

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support Up to 3840x2160
eDP 1.2 signal support Up to 3840x2160
HDCP content protection
HDMI
LVDS signal support Up to 1920x1200
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming
VGA аnalog display support Up to 2048x1536

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None None
Bus support PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0
Laptop size medium sized

API support

DirectX 12.0 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
OpenCL 1.1

Memory

Memory bus width 64 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 6008 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 80.0 GB / s
Shared memory 0
Standard memory configuration GDDR5

Technologies

3D Blu-Ray
Adaptive VSync
Ansel
BatteryBoost
CUDA
Direct Compute
FXAA
GeForce Experience
GeForce ShadowPlay
GPU Boost
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
Optimus
SLI
TXAA