NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super vs AMD Radeon R7 260X

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super and AMD Radeon R7 260X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• Around 77% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1000 MHz
• 2.9x more pipelines: 2560 vs 896
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
• 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
• 5.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18198 vs 3192
• Around 68% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 879 vs 523
• 6.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 293.508 vs 43.745
• 5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4045.784 vs 804.436
• 7.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 29.145 vs 3.673
• 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 158.103 vs 64.088
• 6.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1438.826 vs 221.539
• 6.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25232 vs 3845
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 3485
• 6.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25232 vs 3845
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 3485

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 260X

• Around 87% lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 215 Watt
• 211.6x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1481 vs 7

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 260X

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	18198 3192
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	879 523
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	293.508 43.745
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4045.784 804.436
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	29.145 3.673
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	158.103 64.088
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1438.826 221.539
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	25232 3845
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3718 3485
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3359 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	25232 3845
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3718 3485
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3359 3358
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	7 1481

Compare specifications (specs)