NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super versus AMD Radeon R7 260X
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super and AMD Radeon R7 260X pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 ans 8 mois plus tard
- Environ 77% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1770 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- 2.9x plus de pipelines: 2560 versus 896
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 28 nm
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 4 GB
- 5.7x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 18198 versus 3192
- Environ 68% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 879 versus 523
- 6.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 293.508 versus 43.745
- 5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4045.784 versus 804.436
- 7.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 29.145 versus 3.673
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 158.103 versus 64.088
- 6.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1438.826 versus 221.539
- 6.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25232 versus 3845
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 versus 3485
- 6.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25232 versus 3845
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 versus 3485
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 2 July 2019 versus 8 October 2013 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1770 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
| Pipelines | 2560 versus 896 |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 28 nm |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 4 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 18198 versus 3192 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 879 versus 523 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 293.508 versus 43.745 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4045.784 versus 804.436 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 29.145 versus 3.673 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 158.103 versus 64.088 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1438.826 versus 221.539 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25232 versus 3845 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 versus 3485 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25232 versus 3845 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 versus 3485 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 3358 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R7 260X
- Environ 87% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 115 Watt versus 215 Watt
- 211.6x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1481 versus 7
| Caractéristiques | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt versus 215 Watt |
| Référence | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1481 versus 7 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 260X
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super | AMD Radeon R7 260X |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 18198 | 3192 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 879 | 523 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 98281 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 293.508 | 43.745 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4045.784 | 804.436 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 29.145 | 3.673 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 158.103 | 64.088 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1438.826 | 221.539 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25232 | 3845 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3485 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25232 | 3845 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3485 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3358 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7 | 1481 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super | AMD Radeon R7 260X | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 2.0 |
| Nom de code | TU104 | Bonaire |
| Date de sortie | 2 July 2019 | 8 October 2013 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $499 | $139 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 129 | 614 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Conception | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
| Prix maintenant | $239 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 17.15 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1770 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1605 MHz | |
| Noyaux CUDA | 2560 | |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Température maximale du GPU | 88 C | |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 896 |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 215 Watt | 115 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 13.6 B | 2,080 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,971 gflops | |
| Stream Processors | 896 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 61.6 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Display Port | 1.4 | |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
| Nombre d’écrans á la fois | 4 | |
| Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | |
| Eyefinity | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Hauteur | 4.556” (115.7mm) | |
| Longeur | 10.5” (266.74mm) | 170 mm |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 650 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 6 pin + 8 pin | 1 x 6-pin |
| Largeur | 2-Slot | |
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | 104 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| Ansel | ||
| HDMI 2.0b | ||
| SLI | ||
| VR Ready | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super vs
NVIDIATesla V100 SXM2 16 GB
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super vs
AMDRadeon RX 5600
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super vs
NVIDIARTX A4000 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super vs
AMDRadeon RX 6700M
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super vs
NVIDIARTX A2000
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 6GB
