NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super

• Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
• Around 11% higher core clock speed: 1605 MHz vs 1440 MHz
• Around 16% lower typical power consumption: 215 Watt vs 250 Watt
• Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 885 vs 791
• Around 35% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 99912 vs 74179
• Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 158.103 vs 153.677
• Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25232 vs 19571
• Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25232 vs 19571

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

• Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18872 vs 18252
• Around 67% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 488.989 vs 293.508
• Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 5451.006 vs 4045.784
• Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 41.461 vs 29.145
• Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1534.582 vs 1438.826
• 1991.9x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 13943 vs 7

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	18252 18872
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	885 791
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	99912 74179
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	293.508 488.989
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4045.784 5451.006
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	29.145 41.461
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	158.103 153.677
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1438.826 1534.582
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	25232 19571
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3718 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3359 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	25232 19571
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3718 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3359 3357
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	7 13943

Compare specifications (specs)