NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super versus NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 10 mois plus tard
- Environ 11% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1605 MHz versus 1440 MHz
- Environ 16% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 215 Watt versus 250 Watt
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 886 versus 791
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 99809 versus 74179
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 158.103 versus 153.677
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25232 versus 19571
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25232 versus 19571
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 2 July 2019 versus 13 August 2018 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1605 MHz versus 1440 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 215 Watt versus 250 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 886 versus 791 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 99809 versus 74179 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 158.103 versus 153.677 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25232 versus 19571 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 versus 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25232 versus 19571 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 versus 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 3357 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 18872 versus 18253
- Environ 67% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 488.989 versus 293.508
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 5451.006 versus 4045.784
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 41.461 versus 29.145
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1534.582 versus 1438.826
- 1991.9x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 13943 versus 7
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 18872 versus 18253 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 488.989 versus 293.508 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5451.006 versus 4045.784 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.461 versus 29.145 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1534.582 versus 1438.826 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 13943 versus 7 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 18253 | 18872 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 886 | 791 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 99809 | 74179 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 293.508 | 488.989 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4045.784 | 5451.006 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 29.145 | 41.461 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 158.103 | 153.677 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1438.826 | 1534.582 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25232 | 19571 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25232 | 19571 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3357 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7 | 13943 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Nom de code | TU104 | TU102 |
| Date de sortie | 2 July 2019 | 13 August 2018 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $499 | $6,299 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 133 | 112 |
| Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1770 MHz | 1770 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1605 MHz | 1440 MHz |
| Noyaux CUDA | 2560 | |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Température maximale du GPU | 88 C | |
| Pipelines | 2560 | |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 215 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 13.6 B | 18,600 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Display Port | 1.4 | |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
| Nombre d’écrans á la fois | 4 | |
| Connecteurs d’écran | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Hauteur | 4.556” (115.7mm) | |
| Longeur | 10.5” (266.74mm) | 267 mm |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 650 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 6 pin + 8 pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Largeur | 2-Slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | 14000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | |
Technologies |
||
| Ansel | ||
| HDMI 2.0b | ||
| SLI | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super vs
NVIDIATesla V100 SXM2 16 GB
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 56 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super vs
NVIDIAT1000 8 GB
