NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super und NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 10 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 11% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1605 MHz vs 1440 MHz
- Etwa 16% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 215 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Etwa 12% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 885 vs 791
- Etwa 35% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 99847 vs 74179
- Etwa 3% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 158.103 vs 153.677
- Etwa 29% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25232 vs 19571
- Etwa 29% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25232 vs 19571
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 2 July 2019 vs 13 August 2018 |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1605 MHz vs 1440 MHz |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 215 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 885 vs 791 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 99847 vs 74179 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 158.103 vs 153.677 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25232 vs 19571 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25232 vs 19571 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3357 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
- Etwa 3% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18872 vs 18252
- Etwa 67% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 488.989 vs 293.508
- Etwa 35% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 5451.006 vs 4045.784
- Etwa 42% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 41.461 vs 29.145
- Etwa 7% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1534.582 vs 1438.826
- 1991.9x bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 13943 vs 7
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18872 vs 18252 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 488.989 vs 293.508 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5451.006 vs 4045.784 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.461 vs 29.145 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1534.582 vs 1438.826 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 13943 vs 7 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18252 | 18872 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 885 | 791 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 99847 | 74179 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 293.508 | 488.989 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4045.784 | 5451.006 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 29.145 | 41.461 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 158.103 | 153.677 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1438.826 | 1534.582 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25232 | 19571 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25232 | 19571 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3357 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7 | 13943 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Turing | Turing |
Codename | TU104 | TU102 |
Startdatum | 2 July 2019 | 13 August 2018 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $499 | $6,299 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 133 | 112 |
Typ | Desktop | Workstation |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1770 MHz | 1770 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1605 MHz | 1440 MHz |
CUDA-Kerne | 2560 | |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Maximale GPU-Temperatur | 88 C | |
Leitungssysteme | 2560 | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 215 Watt | 250 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 13.6 B | 18,600 million |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display Port | 1.4 | |
DisplayPort-Unterstützung | ||
Dual-Link-DVI-Unterstützung | ||
G-SYNC-Unterstützung | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Multi-Monitor-Unterstützung | ||
Anzahl der gleichzeitigen Anzeigen | 4 | |
Display-Anschlüsse | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Höhe | 4.556” (115.7mm) | |
Länge | 10.5” (266.74mm) | 267 mm |
Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 650 Watt | |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 6 pin + 8 pin | 2x 8-pin |
Breite | 2-Slot | |
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 8 GB | |
Speicherbandbreite | 448 GB/s | |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 256 bit | |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 14000 MHz | 14000 MHz |
Speichertyp | GDDR6 | |
Technologien |
||
Ansel | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
SLI | ||
VR Ready |