NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 15 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 4697.9x more texture fill rate: 67.65 GTexel/s vs 14.4 GTexel / s
- 42.7x more pipelines: 2048 vs 48
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 65 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 90% higher memory clock speed: 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) vs 790 MHz
- 31.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6831 vs 220
- 9.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 403 vs 44
- 8.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 50663 vs 5892
- 4.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8045 vs 1686
- 4.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8045 vs 1686
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2021 vs 26 January 2010 |
Texture fill rate | 67.65 GTexel/s vs 14.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 48 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 65 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) vs 790 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6831 vs 220 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 403 vs 44 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 50663 vs 5892 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8045 vs 1686 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8045 vs 1686 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
- Around 91% higher core clock speed: 1360 MHz vs 712 MHz
- Around 29% lower typical power consumption: 58 Watt vs 75 Watt
Core clock speed | 1360 MHz vs 712 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 58 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6831 | 220 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 403 | 44 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 50663 | 5892 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 165.993 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1980.866 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.641 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.641 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 745.481 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15760 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8923 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8045 | 1686 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15760 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8923 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8045 | 1686 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 421 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Tesla |
Code name | GA107 | G94 |
Launch date | 2021 | 26 January 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 248 | 1583 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $79.99 | |
Price now | $79.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 5.72 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1057 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 712 MHz | 1360 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 65 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 67.65 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 4.329 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.329 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2048 | 48 |
Pixel fill rate | 42.28 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 67.65 GTexel/s | 14.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 58 Watt |
CUDA cores | 48 | |
Floating-point performance | 144 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Transistor count | 505 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, VGADVIHDMI |
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF + HDA | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Width | IGP | |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 6.6" (16.8 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 10.0 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.1 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 25.3 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) | 790 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
CUDA |