NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile

• Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 4 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
• Around 60% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 120 Watt
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8923 vs 3718
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8045 vs 3355
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8923 vs 3718
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8045 vs 3355

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

• 2.1x more core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 712 MHz
• Around 67% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1057 MHz
• 8x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)
• Around 89% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12900 vs 6831
• 2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 807 vs 403
• Around 21% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 61100 vs 50663
• Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 208.608 vs 165.993
• Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2573.643 vs 1980.866
• Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 16.447 vs 14.641
• Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 145.886 vs 135.641
• Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 926.614 vs 745.481
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16952 vs 15760
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16952 vs 15760
• 2.5x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1061 vs 421

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	6831 12900
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	403 807
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	50663 61100
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	165.993 208.608
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1980.866 2573.643
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	14.641 16.447
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	135.641 145.886
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	745.481 926.614
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15760 16952
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8923 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8045 3355
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15760 16952
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8923 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8045 3355
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	421 1061

Compare specifications (specs)