NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 6 ans 4 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 12 nm
- Environ 60% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 120 Watt
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8923 versus 3718
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8045 versus 3355
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8923 versus 3718
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8045 versus 3355
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 2021 versus 22 February 2019 |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 12 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 120 Watt |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8923 versus 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8045 versus 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8923 versus 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8045 versus 3355 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- 2.1x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1500 MHz versus 712 MHz
- Environ 67% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1770 MHz versus 1057 MHz
- 8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 12000 MHz versus 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)
- Environ 89% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 12900 versus 6831
- 2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 807 versus 403
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 61100 versus 50663
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 208.608 versus 165.993
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2573.643 versus 1980.866
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 16.447 versus 14.641
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 145.886 versus 135.641
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 926.614 versus 745.481
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16952 versus 15760
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16952 versus 15760
- 2.5x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1061 versus 421
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1500 MHz versus 712 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1770 MHz versus 1057 MHz |
Vitesse de mémoire | 12000 MHz versus 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12900 versus 6831 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 807 versus 403 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 61100 versus 50663 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 208.608 versus 165.993 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2573.643 versus 1980.866 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.447 versus 14.641 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 145.886 versus 135.641 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 926.614 versus 745.481 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16952 versus 15760 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16952 versus 15760 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1061 versus 421 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6831 | 12900 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 403 | 807 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 50663 | 61100 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 165.993 | 208.608 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1980.866 | 2573.643 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.641 | 16.447 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.641 | 145.886 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 745.481 | 926.614 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15760 | 16952 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8923 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8045 | 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15760 | 16952 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8923 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8045 | 3355 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 421 | 1061 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
Nom de code | GA107 | TU116 |
Date de sortie | 2021 | 22 February 2019 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 248 | 221 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $279 | |
Prix maintenant | $279.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 67.32 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1057 MHz | 1770 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 712 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 67.65 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 4.329 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.329 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2048 | |
Pixel fill rate | 42.28 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 67.65 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 120 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 6,600 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compte DisplayPort | 1 | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 8-pin |
Largeur | IGP | |
Longeur | 229 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 192 GB/s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) | 12000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 |