NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
• Around 1% higher core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1485 MHz
• Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 1725 MHz vs 1665 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
• 2.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 22253 vs 7881
• Around 77% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 999 vs 564
• 3.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 123479 vs 39165
• 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 453.922 vs 134.765
• 4.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 5803.174 vs 1316.075
• 4.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 40.757 vs 8.799
• Around 92% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 182.055 vs 94.915
• 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1664.554 vs 573.418
• 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 31716 vs 10959
• 3.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 13566 vs 3715
• 9.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 31930 vs 3358
• 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 31716 vs 10959
• 3.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 13566 vs 3715
• 9.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 31930 vs 3358
• 10.4x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3163 vs 305

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

• 4.6x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	22253 7881
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	999 564
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	123479 39165
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	453.922 134.765
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5803.174 1316.075
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	40.757 8.799
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	182.055 94.915
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1664.554 573.418
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	31716 10959
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13566 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	31930 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	31716 10959
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13566 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	31930 3358
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	3163 305

Compare specifications (specs)