NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 1% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1500 MHz versus 1485 MHz
- Environ 4% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1725 MHz versus 1665 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 12 nm
- 2.8x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 22253 versus 7881
- Environ 77% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 999 versus 564
- 3.2x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 123479 versus 39165
- 3.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 453.922 versus 134.765
- 4.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 5803.174 versus 1316.075
- 4.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 40.757 versus 8.799
- Environ 92% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 182.055 versus 94.915
- 2.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1664.554 versus 573.418
- 2.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 31716 versus 10959
- 3.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 13566 versus 3715
- 9.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 31930 versus 3358
- 2.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 31716 versus 10959
- 3.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 13566 versus 3715
- 9.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 31930 versus 3358
- 10.4x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3163 versus 305
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 Sep 2020 versus 30 April 2019 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1500 MHz versus 1485 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1725 MHz versus 1665 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 12 nm |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22253 versus 7881 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 999 versus 564 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 123479 versus 39165 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 453.922 versus 134.765 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5803.174 versus 1316.075 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 40.757 versus 8.799 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 182.055 versus 94.915 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1664.554 versus 573.418 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 31716 versus 10959 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 13566 versus 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 31930 versus 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 31716 versus 10959 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 13566 versus 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 31930 versus 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3163 versus 305 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- 4.6x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 8000 MHz versus 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
Vitesse de mémoire | 8000 MHz versus 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22253 | 7881 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 999 | 564 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 123479 | 39165 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 453.922 | 134.765 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5803.174 | 1316.075 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 40.757 | 8.799 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 182.055 | 94.915 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1664.554 | 573.418 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 31716 | 10959 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 13566 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 31930 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 31716 | 10959 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 13566 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 31930 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3163 | 305 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
Nom de code | GA104 | TU107 |
Date de sortie | 1 Sep 2020 | 30 April 2019 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $499 | $179 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 44 | 376 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1725 MHz | 1665 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1500 MHz | 1485 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 317.4 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 20.31 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 20.31 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 5888 | |
Pixel fill rate | 165.6 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 317.4 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 220 Watt | |
Compte de transistor | 17400 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compte DisplayPort | 1 | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | |
Hauteur | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 242 mm, 9.5 inches | |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 12-pin | None |
Largeur | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 448.0 GB/s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 8000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 |