NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 vs AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 and AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 16% higher core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Around 13% higher boost clock speed: 1695 MHz vs 1500 MHz
- 1447.9x more texture fill rate: 556.0 GTexel/s vs 384.0 GTexel / s
- 2.6x more pipelines: 10496 vs 4096
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 14 nm
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 16 GB
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 26668 vs 12285
- Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1060 vs 731
- 2.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 191142 vs 66605
- 4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 690.619 vs 174.714
- Around 93% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 7585.258 vs 3924.968
- 3.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 62.614 vs 17.305
- Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 209.424 vs 175.219
- Around 99% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2441.384 vs 1226.861
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 33398 vs 13848
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3713 vs 3680
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3354 vs 3336
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 33398 vs 13848
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3713 vs 3680
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3354 vs 3336
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 Sep 2020 vs 10 July 2017 |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1695 MHz vs 1500 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 556.0 GTexel/s vs 384.0 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 10496 vs 4096 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 14 nm |
Maximum memory size | 24 GB vs 16 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 26668 vs 12285 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1060 vs 731 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 191142 vs 66605 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 690.619 vs 174.714 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7585.258 vs 3924.968 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 62.614 vs 17.305 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 209.424 vs 175.219 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2441.384 vs 1226.861 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 33398 vs 13848 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 vs 3680 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 vs 3336 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 33398 vs 13848 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 vs 3680 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 vs 3336 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100
- Around 52% lower typical power consumption: 230 Watt vs 350 Watt
- Around 55% higher memory clock speed: 1890 MHz vs 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 230 Watt vs 350 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1890 MHz vs 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
GPU 2: AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 | AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 26668 | 12285 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1060 | 731 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 191142 | 66605 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 690.619 | 174.714 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7585.258 | 3924.968 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 62.614 | 17.305 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 209.424 | 175.219 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2441.384 | 1226.861 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 33398 | 13848 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 | 3680 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | 3336 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 33398 | 13848 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 | 3680 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | 3336 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5118 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 | AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | GA102 | Vega 10 |
Launch date | 1 Sep 2020 | 10 July 2017 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1499 | $1,599 |
Place in performance rating | 46 | 202 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1695 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 556.0 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 35.58 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 35.58 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 10496 | 4096 |
Pixel fill rate | 189.8 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 556.0 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 350 Watt | 230 Watt |
Transistor count | 28300 million | 12,500 million |
Floating-point performance | 12,288 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 6x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Height | 138 mm (5.4 inches) | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 313 mm (12.3 inches) | 267 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 750 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Width | Triple-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 24 GB | 16 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 936.2 GB/s | 483.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 bit | 2048 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) | 1890 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6X | HBM2 |