NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 vs AMD Radeon Pro W5500
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 and AMD Radeon Pro W5500 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- Around 18% higher core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 1187 MHz
- Around 21% higher boost clock speed: 1695 MHz vs 1400 MHz
- 4.5x more texture fill rate: 556.0 GTexel/s vs 123.2 GTexel/s
- 7.5x more pipelines: 10496 vs 1408
- 3x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 8 GB
- 5.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 732.196 vs 130.7
- 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 7585.258 vs 2361.73
- 4.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 63.011 vs 13.641
- Around 83% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 247.569 vs 135.462
- 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2441.384 vs 774.974
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 33398 vs 12184
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3713 vs 3463
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 33398 vs 12184
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3713 vs 3463
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 Sep 2020 vs 10 Feb 2020 |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz vs 1187 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1695 MHz vs 1400 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 556.0 GTexel/s vs 123.2 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 10496 vs 1408 |
Maximum memory size | 24 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 732.196 vs 130.7 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7585.258 vs 2361.73 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 63.011 vs 13.641 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 247.569 vs 135.462 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2441.384 vs 774.974 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 33398 vs 12184 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 vs 3463 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 33398 vs 12184 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 vs 3463 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5500
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 8 nm
- 2.8x lower typical power consumption: 125 Watt vs 350 Watt
- Around 44% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) vs 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective)
Specifications (specs) | |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 8 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt vs 350 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) vs 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 3354 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro W5500
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 | AMD Radeon Pro W5500 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 26815 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1051 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 188320 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 732.196 | 130.7 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7585.258 | 2361.73 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 63.011 | 13.641 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 247.569 | 135.462 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2441.384 | 774.974 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 33398 | 12184 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 | 3463 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 33398 | 12184 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 | 3463 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | 3355 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 19877 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 | AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 1.0 |
Code name | GA102 | Navi 14 |
Launch date | 1 Sep 2020 | 10 Feb 2020 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1499 | $399 |
Place in performance rating | 40 | 330 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1695 MHz | 1400 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 1187 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 7 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 556.0 GFLOPS (1:64) | 246.4 GFLOPS (1:16) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 35.58 TFLOPS (1:1) | 7.885 TFLOPS (2:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 35.58 TFLOPS | 3.942 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 10496 | 1408 |
Pixel fill rate | 189.8 GPixel/s | 44.80 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 556.0 GTexel/s | 123.2 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 350 Watt | 125 Watt |
Transistor count | 28300 million | 6400 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 4x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Height | 138 mm (5.4 inches) | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
Length | 313 mm (12.3 inches) | 267 mm (10.5 inches) |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 750 Watt | 350 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | 1x 6-pin |
Width | Triple-slot | Single-slot |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 24 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 936.2 GB/s | 224 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 384 bit | 128 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |