NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 vs AMD Radeon Pro W5500
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 and AMD Radeon Pro W5500 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- Around 18% higher core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 1187 MHz
- Around 21% higher boost clock speed: 1695 MHz vs 1400 MHz
- 4.5x more texture fill rate: 556.0 GTexel/s vs 123.2 GTexel/s
- 7.5x more pipelines: 10496 vs 1408
- 3x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 8 GB
- 5.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 690.619 vs 130.7
- 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 7585.258 vs 2361.73
- 4.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 62.614 vs 13.641
- Around 55% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 209.424 vs 135.462
- 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2441.384 vs 774.974
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 33398 vs 12184
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3713 vs 3463
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 33398 vs 12184
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3713 vs 3463
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 Sep 2020 vs 10 Feb 2020 |
| Core clock speed | 1395 MHz vs 1187 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1695 MHz vs 1400 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 556.0 GTexel/s vs 123.2 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 10496 vs 1408 |
| Maximum memory size | 24 GB vs 8 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 690.619 vs 130.7 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7585.258 vs 2361.73 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 62.614 vs 13.641 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 209.424 vs 135.462 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2441.384 vs 774.974 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 33398 vs 12184 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 vs 3463 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 33398 vs 12184 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 vs 3463 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5500
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 8 nm
- 2.8x lower typical power consumption: 125 Watt vs 350 Watt
- Around 44% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) vs 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective)
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 8 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt vs 350 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) vs 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 3354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 3354 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro W5500
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 | AMD Radeon Pro W5500 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 26668 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1060 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 191142 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 690.619 | 130.7 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7585.258 | 2361.73 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 62.614 | 13.641 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 209.424 | 135.462 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2441.384 | 774.974 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 33398 | 12184 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 | 3463 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 33398 | 12184 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 | 3463 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | 3355 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5118 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 | AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 1.0 |
| Code name | GA102 | Navi 14 |
| Launch date | 1 Sep 2020 | 10 Feb 2020 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1499 | $399 |
| Place in performance rating | 46 | 324 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1695 MHz | 1400 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 1187 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 556.0 GFLOPS (1:64) | 246.4 GFLOPS (1:16) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 35.58 TFLOPS (1:1) | 7.885 TFLOPS (2:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 35.58 TFLOPS | 3.942 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 10496 | 1408 |
| Pixel fill rate | 189.8 GPixel/s | 44.80 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 556.0 GTexel/s | 123.2 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 350 Watt | 125 Watt |
| Transistor count | 28300 million | 6400 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 4x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Height | 138 mm (5.4 inches) | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
| Length | 313 mm (12.3 inches) | 267 mm (10.5 inches) |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 750 Watt | 350 Watt |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Width | Triple-slot | Single-slot |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 24 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 936.2 GB/s | 224 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 384 bit | 128 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3090 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3070
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3090 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3070 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3090 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3090 vs
NVIDIARTX 4000 Ada Generation
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3090 vs
NVIDIARTX 5000 Ada Generation 16GB
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3090 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
