NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 versus AMD Radeon Pro W5500
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 and AMD Radeon Pro W5500 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 6 mois plus tard
- Environ 18% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1395 MHz versus 1187 MHz
- Environ 21% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1695 MHz versus 1400 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 556.0 GTexel/s versus 123.2 GTexel/s
- 7.5x plus de pipelines: 10496 versus 1408
- 3x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 24 GB versus 8 GB
- 5.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 732.196 versus 130.7
- 3.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 7585.258 versus 2361.73
- 4.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 63.011 versus 13.641
- Environ 83% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 247.569 versus 135.462
- 3.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2441.384 versus 774.974
- 2.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 33398 versus 12184
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3713 versus 3463
- 2.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 33398 versus 12184
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3713 versus 3463
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 Sep 2020 versus 10 Feb 2020 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1395 MHz versus 1187 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1695 MHz versus 1400 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 556.0 GTexel/s versus 123.2 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 10496 versus 1408 |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 24 GB versus 8 GB |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 732.196 versus 130.7 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7585.258 versus 2361.73 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 63.011 versus 13.641 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 247.569 versus 135.462 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2441.384 versus 774.974 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 33398 versus 12184 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 versus 3463 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 33398 versus 12184 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 versus 3463 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro W5500
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 7 nm versus 8 nm
- 2.8x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 125 Watt versus 350 Watt
- Environ 44% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) versus 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective)
| Caractéristiques | |
| Processus de fabrication | 7 nm versus 8 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt versus 350 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) versus 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 versus 3354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 versus 3354 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro W5500
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 | AMD Radeon Pro W5500 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 26815 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1051 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 188320 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 732.196 | 130.7 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7585.258 | 2361.73 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 63.011 | 13.641 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 247.569 | 135.462 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2441.384 | 774.974 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 33398 | 12184 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 | 3463 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 33398 | 12184 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 | 3463 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | 3355 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 19877 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 | AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 1.0 |
| Nom de code | GA102 | Navi 14 |
| Date de sortie | 1 Sep 2020 | 10 Feb 2020 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $1499 | $399 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 40 | 330 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1695 MHz | 1400 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1395 MHz | 1187 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 556.0 GFLOPS (1:64) | 246.4 GFLOPS (1:16) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 35.58 TFLOPS (1:1) | 7.885 TFLOPS (2:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 35.58 TFLOPS | 3.942 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 10496 | 1408 |
| Pixel fill rate | 189.8 GPixel/s | 44.80 GPixel/s |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 556.0 GTexel/s | 123.2 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 350 Watt | 125 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 28300 million | 6400 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 4x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Hauteur | 138 mm (5.4 inches) | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
| Longeur | 313 mm (12.3 inches) | 267 mm (10.5 inches) |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 750 Watt | 350 Watt |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 12-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Largeur | Triple-slot | Single-slot |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 24 GB | 8 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 936.2 GB/s | 224 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 384 bit | 128 bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3090 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3070
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3090 vs
NVIDIATesla V100S PCIe 32 GB
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3090 vs
AMDRadeon Pro W6600
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3090 vs
NVIDIARTX A4500
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3090 vs
NVIDIARTX A5500
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3090 vs
NVIDIARTX 4000 Ada Generation
