NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 and NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• Around 13% higher core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 1230 MHz
• Around 23% higher boost clock speed: 1695 MHz vs 1380 MHz
• 1259.1x more texture fill rate: 556.0 GTexel/s vs 441.6 GTexel / s
• 2.1x more pipelines: 10496 vs 5120
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
• 3.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 26815 vs 8260
• 3.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1051 vs 327
• Around 15% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 188320 vs 163779
• Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 732.196 vs 592.008
• Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 63.011 vs 46.266
• Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2441.384 vs 2169.759
• 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 33398 vs 9969
• Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3713 vs 3521
• 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 33398 vs 9969
• Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3713 vs 3521

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB

• Around 40% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 350 Watt
• Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 24 GB
• Around 44% higher memory clock speed: 1752 MHz vs 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective)
• Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 271.318 vs 247.569

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	26815 8260
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1051 327
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	188320 163779
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	732.196 592.008
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	63.011 46.266
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	247.569 271.318
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2441.384 2169.759
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	33398 9969
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3713 3521
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3354 3360
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	33398 9969
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3713 3521
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3354 3360

Compare specifications (specs)