NVIDIA NVS 510 vs NVIDIA GeForce 210
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA NVS 510 and NVIDIA GeForce 210 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 510
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 3.1x more texture fill rate: 12.75 GTexel / s vs 4.16 GTexel / s
- 12x more pipelines: 192 vs 16
- 7.8x better floating-point performance: 306.0 gflops vs 39.36 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
- 3.6x more memory clock speed: 1782 MHz vs 500 MHz
- 5.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 685 vs 126
- 9.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 286 vs 30
- Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 976 vs 497
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1720 vs 688
- Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 976 vs 497
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1720 vs 688
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 23 October 2012 vs 12 October 2009 |
| Texture fill rate | 12.75 GTexel / s vs 4.16 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 192 vs 16 |
| Floating-point performance | 306.0 gflops vs 39.36 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 512 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz vs 500 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 685 vs 126 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 286 vs 30 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 976 vs 497 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1720 vs 688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 976 vs 497 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1720 vs 688 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 210
- Around 76% higher core clock speed: 1402 MHz vs 797 MHz
- Around 13% lower typical power consumption: 30.5 Watt vs 35 Watt
- Around 43% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2438 vs 1699
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1402 MHz vs 797 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30.5 Watt vs 35 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2438 vs 1699 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA NVS 510
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 210
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA NVS 510 | NVIDIA GeForce 210 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 685 | 126 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 286 | 30 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1699 | 2438 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.809 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 111.269 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.399 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 7.769 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 9.522 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1211 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 976 | 497 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1720 | 688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1211 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 976 | 497 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1720 | 688 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA NVS 510 | NVIDIA GeForce 210 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | GK107 | GT218 |
| Launch date | 23 October 2012 | 12 October 2009 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $449 | $29.49 |
| Place in performance rating | 1450 | 1674 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Price now | $32.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 6.81 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 797 MHz | 1402 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 306.0 gflops | 39.36 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 192 | 16 |
| Texture fill rate | 12.75 GTexel / s | 4.16 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 30.5 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 260 million |
| CUDA cores | 16 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA, DVIVGADisplayPort |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 160 mm | 6.60" (16.8 cm) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Height | 2.731" (6.9 cm) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.1 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB / s | 8.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | 500 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR2 |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA NVS 510 with others
NVIDIANVS 510 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7650A
NVIDIANVS 510 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7570M
NVIDIANVS 510 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 635M
NVIDIANVS 510 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 735M
NVIDIANVS 510 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8400E
NVIDIANVS 510 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K1100M
