NVIDIA NVS 510 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 630

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA NVS 510 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 510

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
• 2x more pipelines: 192 vs 96
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 86% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 65 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 701 vs 679
• Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 290 vs 214
• Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.809 vs 6.498
• Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1211 vs 1151
• Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1211 vs 1151

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 630

• Around 2% higher core clock speed: 810 MHz vs 797 MHz
• Around 2% higher texture fill rate: 12.96 GTexel / s vs 12.75 GTexel / s
• Around 2% better floating-point performance: 311.0 gflops vs 306.0 gflops
• Around 1% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1782 MHz
• Around 43% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2393 vs 1677
• Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 140.06 vs 111.269
• Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.502 vs 0.399
• 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 9.613 vs 3.385
• Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 12.49 vs 9.522
• Around 90% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1853 vs 976
• Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2073 vs 1720
• Around 90% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1853 vs 976
• Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2073 vs 1720

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA NVS 510
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 630

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	701 679
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	290 214
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	1677 2393
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6.809 6.498
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	111.269 140.06
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.399 0.502
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.385 9.613
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9.522 12.49
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1211 1151
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	976 1853
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1720 2073
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1211 1151
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	976 1853
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1720 2073

Compare specifications (specs)