NVIDIA NVS 510 vs NVIDIA NVS 5400M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA NVS 510 and NVIDIA NVS 5400M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 510

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
• Around 21% higher core clock speed: 797 MHz vs 660 MHz
• Around 21% higher texture fill rate: 12.75 GTexel / s vs 10.56 GTexel / s
• 2x more pipelines: 192 vs 96
• Around 21% better floating-point performance: 306.0 gflops vs 253.4 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 686 vs 624
• Around 53% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 287 vs 187
• Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.809 vs 5.068
• Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1211 vs 1069
• Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1211 vs 1069

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 5400M

• Around 1% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1782 MHz
• Around 24% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2101 vs 1701
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 229.562 vs 111.269
• Around 59% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.635 vs 0.399
• Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 11.384 vs 7.769
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 19.696 vs 9.522
• Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1652 vs 976
• Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2282 vs 1720
• Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1652 vs 976
• Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2282 vs 1720

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA NVS 510
GPU 2: NVIDIA NVS 5400M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	686 624
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	287 187
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	1701 2101
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6.809 5.068
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	111.269 229.562
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.399 0.635
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7.769 11.384
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9.522 19.696
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1211 1069
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	976 1652
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1720 2282
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1211 1069
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	976 1652
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1720 2282

Compare specifications (specs)