NVIDIA NVS 510 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 580

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA NVS 510 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 580 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA NVS 510

vs

NVIDIA Quadro FX 580

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 510

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• Around 77% higher core clock speed: 797 MHz vs 450 MHz
• Around 77% higher texture fill rate: 12.75 GTexel / s vs 7.2 GTexel / s
• 6x more pipelines: 192 vs 32
• 4.3x better floating-point performance: 306.0 gflops vs 72 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
• Around 14% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 40 Watt
• 4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
• Around 11% higher memory clock speed: 1782 MHz vs 1600 MHz
• 3.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 685 vs 174
• 7x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 286 vs 41
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1720 vs 1687
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1720 vs 1687

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA NVS 510
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 580

Compare specifications (specs)