NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- 2.8x more texture fill rate: 28 GTexel / s vs 10 GTexel / s
- 3.5x more pipelines: 112 vs 32
- 3.5x better floating-point performance: 280 gflops vs 80 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 65 nm vs 80 nm
- 2.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 378 vs 131
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 8 January 2008 vs 1 June 2007 |
Texture fill rate | 28 GTexel / s vs 10 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 112 vs 32 |
Floating-point performance | 280 gflops vs 80 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 80 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 378 vs 131 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M
- Around 25% higher core clock speed: 625 MHz vs 500 MHz
- Around 56% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 78 Watt
- Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 109 vs 91
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 625 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 78 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 109 vs 91 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 378 | 131 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 91 | 109 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3285 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3285 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Tesla |
Code name | G92 | G84 |
Launch date | 8 January 2008 | 1 June 2007 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,599 | $149.90 |
Place in performance rating | 1304 | 1305 |
Price now | $99.02 | $149.90 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 8.26 | 1.87 |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 625 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 280 gflops | 80 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 80 nm |
Pipelines | 112 | 32 |
Texture fill rate | 28 GTexel / s | 10 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 78 Watt | 50 Watt |
Transistor count | 754 million | 289 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-HE |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 |