NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
  • Around 20% higher core clock speed: 600 MHz vs 500 MHz
  • Around 37% higher texture fill rate: 38.4 GTexel / s vs 28 GTexel / s
  • Around 71% higher pipelines: 192 vs 112
  • Around 65% better floating-point performance: 462.3 gflops vs 280 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 65 nm
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
  • 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 825 vs 372
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 30 March 2009 vs 8 January 2008
Core clock speed 600 MHz vs 500 MHz
Texture fill rate 38.4 GTexel / s vs 28 GTexel / s
Pipelines 192 vs 112
Floating-point performance 462.3 gflops vs 280 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 55 nm vs 65 nm
Maximum memory size 1 GB vs 512 MB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 825 vs 372

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700

  • Around 38% lower typical power consumption: 78 Watt vs 108 Watt
  • Around 65% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 81 vs 49
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3285 vs 3258
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3285 vs 3258
Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 78 Watt vs 108 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 81 vs 49
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3285 vs 3258
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3285 vs 3258

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
825
372
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
49
81
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3258
3285
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3258
3285
Name NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700
PassMark - G3D Mark 825 372
PassMark - G2D Mark 49 81
Geekbench - OpenCL 13337
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3258 3285
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3258 3285

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700

Essentials

Architecture Tesla 2.0 Tesla
Code name GT200B G92
Launch date 30 March 2009 8 January 2008
Launch price (MSRP) $799 $1,599
Place in performance rating 1363 1330
Price now $109.99 $99.02
Type Workstation Workstation
Value for money (0-100) 9.89 8.26

Technical info

Core clock speed 600 MHz 500 MHz
Floating-point performance 462.3 gflops 280 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 55 nm 65 nm
Pipelines 192 112
Texture fill rate 38.4 GTexel / s 28 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 108 Watt 78 Watt
Transistor count 1,400 million 754 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort 2x DVI, 1x S-Video

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Length 198 mm 267 mm
Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin 1x 6-pin

API support

DirectX 10.0 10.0
OpenGL 3.3 3.3

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 512 MB
Memory bandwidth 51.2 GB / s 51.2 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 Bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 1600 MHz 1600 MHz
Memory type GDDR3 GDDR3