NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 570
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M and NVIDIA Quadro FX 570 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
- Around 9% higher core clock speed: 500 MHz vs 460 MHz
- 2.2x more texture fill rate: 8 GTexel / s vs 3.68 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 32 vs 16
- 2.7x better floating-point performance: 80 gflops vs 29.44 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 65 nm vs 80 nm
- Around 9% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 38 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 512 MB vs 256 MB
- 2x more memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 800 MHz
- Around 91% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1640 vs 858
- Around 91% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1640 vs 858
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 14 August 2008 vs 12 September 2007 |
Core clock speed | 500 MHz vs 460 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 8 GTexel / s vs 3.68 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 32 vs 16 |
Floating-point performance | 80 gflops vs 29.44 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 80 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 38 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 512 MB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 221 vs 220 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1640 vs 858 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1640 vs 858 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 570
- Around 73% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 64 vs 37
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 64 vs 37 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 570
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M | NVIDIA Quadro FX 570 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 221 | 220 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 37 | 64 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1640 | 858 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1640 | 858 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M | NVIDIA Quadro FX 570 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Tesla |
Code name | G96 | G84 |
Launch date | 14 August 2008 | 12 September 2007 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $527 | $199 |
Place in performance rating | 1602 | 1604 |
Price now | $527 | $89.99 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 0.73 | 1.66 |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 460 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 80 gflops | 29.44 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 80 nm |
Pipelines | 32 | 16 |
Texture fill rate | 8 GTexel / s | 3.68 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 38 Watt |
Transistor count | 314 million | 289 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-II | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Length | 198 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | 12.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR2 / GDDR3 | DDR2 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
PowerMizer 8.0 |