NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 570

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M and NVIDIA Quadro FX 570 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
• Around 9% higher core clock speed: 500 MHz vs 460 MHz
• 2.2x more texture fill rate: 8 GTexel / s vs 3.68 GTexel / s
• 2x more pipelines: 32 vs 16
• 2.7x better floating-point performance: 80 gflops vs 29.44 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 65 nm vs 80 nm
• Around 9% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 38 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 512 MB vs 256 MB
• 2x more memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 800 MHz
• Around 91% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1640 vs 858
• Around 91% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1640 vs 858

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 570

• Around 73% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 64 vs 37

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 570

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	221 220
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	37 64
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1640 858
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1640 858

Compare specifications (specs)