NVIDIA Quadro K1100M vs NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K1100M and NVIDIA Quadro K2100M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K1100M
- Around 6% higher core clock speed: 706 MHz vs 667 MHz
- Around 22% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 55 Watt
Core clock speed | 706 MHz vs 667 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 55 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
- Around 42% higher texture fill rate: 32.02 GTexel / s vs 22.59 GTexel / s
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 576 vs 384
- Around 42% better floating-point performance: 768.4 gflops vs 542.2 gflops
- Around 7% higher memory clock speed: 3008 MHz vs 2800 MHz
- Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1363 vs 1088
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 287 vs 253
- Around 49% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4566 vs 3074
- Around 43% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 12.383 vs 8.649
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 358.892 vs 174.555
- Around 72% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.107 vs 0.642
- Around 85% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 21.761 vs 11.732
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 40.703 vs 16.3
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2294 vs 1892
- 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3605 vs 861
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3362 vs 1443
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2294 vs 1892
- 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3605 vs 861
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3362 vs 1443
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 32.02 GTexel / s vs 22.59 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 576 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 768.4 gflops vs 542.2 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 3008 MHz vs 2800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1363 vs 1088 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 287 vs 253 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4566 vs 3074 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.383 vs 8.649 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 358.892 vs 174.555 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.107 vs 0.642 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.761 vs 11.732 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 40.703 vs 16.3 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2294 vs 1892 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3605 vs 861 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3362 vs 1443 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2294 vs 1892 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3605 vs 861 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3362 vs 1443 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K1100M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro K1100M | NVIDIA Quadro K2100M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1088 | 1363 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 253 | 287 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3074 | 4566 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.649 | 12.383 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 174.555 | 358.892 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.642 | 1.107 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.732 | 21.761 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 16.3 | 40.703 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1892 | 2294 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 861 | 3605 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1443 | 3362 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1892 | 2294 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 861 | 3605 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1443 | 3362 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro K1100M | NVIDIA Quadro K2100M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
Code name | GK107 | GK106 |
Launch date | 23 July 2013 | 23 July 2013 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $109.94 | $84.95 |
Place in performance rating | 1447 | 1101 |
Price now | $79 | $159.99 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Mobile workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 17.59 | 10.91 |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 706 MHz | 667 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 542.2 gflops | 768.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 576 |
Texture fill rate | 22.59 GTexel / s | 32.02 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 55 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 2,540 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Display Port | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | MXM-A (3.0) |
Laptop size | medium sized | medium sized |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 5 | 5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 44.8 GB / s | 48.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2800 MHz | 3008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |