NVIDIA Quadro K1100M versus NVIDIA Quadro K2100M

Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro K1100M and NVIDIA Quadro K2100M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro K1100M

versus

NVIDIA Quadro K2100M

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K1100M

Environ 6% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 706 MHz versus 667 MHz
Environ 22% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 45 Watt versus 55 Watt

Vitesse du noyau	706 MHz versus 667 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	45 Watt versus 55 Watt

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K2100M

Environ 42% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 32.02 GTexel / s versus 22.59 GTexel / s
Environ 50% de pipelines plus haut: 576 versus 384
Environ 42% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 768.4 gflops versus 542.2 gflops
Environ 7% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 3008 MHz versus 2800 MHz
Environ 25% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1363 versus 1088
Environ 13% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 287 versus 253
Environ 49% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 4566 versus 3074
Environ 43% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 12.383 versus 8.649
2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 358.892 versus 174.555
Environ 72% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.107 versus 0.642
Environ 85% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 21.761 versus 11.732
2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 40.703 versus 16.3
Environ 21% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2294 versus 1892
4.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3605 versus 861
2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3362 versus 1443
Environ 21% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2294 versus 1892
4.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3605 versus 861
2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3362 versus 1443

Caractéristiques
Taux de remplissage de la texture	32.02 GTexel / s versus 22.59 GTexel / s
Pipelines	576 versus 384
Performance á point flottant	768.4 gflops versus 542.2 gflops
Vitesse de mémoire	3008 MHz versus 2800 MHz
Référence
PassMark - G3D Mark	1363 versus 1088
PassMark - G2D Mark	287 versus 253
Geekbench - OpenCL	4566 versus 3074
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	12.383 versus 8.649
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	358.892 versus 174.555
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.107 versus 0.642
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	21.761 versus 11.732
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	40.703 versus 16.3
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2294 versus 1892
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3605 versus 861
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3362 versus 1443
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2294 versus 1892
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3605 versus 861
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3362 versus 1443

Comparer les références

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K1100M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K2100M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1088

1363

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

253

287

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

3074

4566

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8.649

12.383

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

174.555

358.892

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

0.642

1.107

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

11.732

21.761

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

16.3

40.703

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1892

2294

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

861

3605

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1443

3362

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1892

2294

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

861

3605

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1443

3362

Nom	NVIDIA Quadro K1100M	NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
PassMark - G3D Mark	1088	1363
PassMark - G2D Mark	253	287
Geekbench - OpenCL	3074	4566
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	8.649	12.383
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	174.555	358.892
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.642	1.107
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	11.732	21.761
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	16.3	40.703
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1892	2294
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	861	3605
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1443	3362
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1892	2294
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	861	3605
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1443	3362
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	0	0

Comparer les caractéristiques

	NVIDIA Quadro K1100M	NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
Essentiel
Architecture	Kepler	Kepler
Nom de code	GK107	GK106
Date de sortie	23 July 2013	23 July 2013
Prix de sortie (MSRP)	$109.94	$84.95
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance	1447	1101
Prix maintenant	$79	$159.99
Genre	Mobile workstation	Mobile workstation
Valeur pour le prix (0-100)	17.59	10.91
Infos techniques
Vitesse du noyau	706 MHz	667 MHz
Performance á point flottant	542.2 gflops	768.4 gflops
Processus de fabrication	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	384	576
Taux de remplissage de la texture	22.59 GTexel / s	32.02 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	45 Watt	55 Watt
Compte de transistor	1,270 million	2,540 million
Sorties et ports de vidéo
Connecteurs d’écran	No outputs	No outputs
Display Port	1.2	1.2
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	MXM-A (3.0)
Taille du laptop	medium sized	medium sized
Soutien API
DirectX	12	12
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
Shader Model	5	5
Vulkan
Mémoire
RAM maximale	2 GB	2 GB
Bande passante de la mémoire	44.8 GB / s	48.0 GB / s
Largeur du bus mémoire	128 Bit	128 Bit
Vitesse de mémoire	2800 MHz	3008 MHz
Genre de mémoire	GDDR5	GDDR5
Mémoire partagé	0	0
Technologies
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus