NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs ATI Radeon 9000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K2000M and ATI Radeon 9000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

ATI Radeon 9000

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 11 month(s) later
3x more core clock speed: 745 MHz vs 250 MHz
23.8x more texture fill rate: 23.84 GTexel / s vs 1 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 150 nm
32x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 64 MB
4.5x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 400 MHz
252.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1011 vs 4
2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 256 vs 123

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	1 June 2012 vs 1 July 2002
Core clock speed	745 MHz vs 250 MHz
Texture fill rate	23.84 GTexel / s vs 1 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 150 nm
Maximum memory size	2 GB vs 64 MB
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz vs 400 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	1011 vs 4
PassMark - G2D Mark	256 vs 123

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon 9000

Around 96% lower typical power consumption: 28 Watt vs 55 Watt

Thermal Design Power (TDP)	28 Watt vs 55 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K2000M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon 9000

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1011

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

256

123

Name	NVIDIA Quadro K2000M	ATI Radeon 9000
PassMark - G3D Mark	1011	4
PassMark - G2D Mark	256	123
Geekbench - OpenCL	3074
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	8.142
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	262.321
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.741
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	16.571
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	18.406
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1726
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2207
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3351
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1726
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2207
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3351

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro K2000M	ATI Radeon 9000
Essentials
Architecture	Kepler	Rage 7
Code name	GK107	RV250
Launch date	1 June 2012	1 July 2002
Launch price (MSRP)	$265.27
Place in performance rating	1256	1253
Price now	$149.95
Type	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Value for money (0-100)	8.53
Technical info
Core clock speed	745 MHz	250 MHz
Floating-point performance	572.2 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	150 nm
Pipelines	384
Texture fill rate	23.84 GTexel / s	1 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	55 Watt	28 Watt
Transistor count	1,270 million	36 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	AGP 4x
Laptop size	medium sized
Supplementary power connectors		None
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	8.1
OpenGL	4.6	1.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	64 MB
Memory bandwidth	28.8 GB / s	6.4 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz	400 MHz
Memory type	DDR3	DDR
Shared memory	0