NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs NVIDIA Quadro K420
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K2200 and NVIDIA Quadro K420 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2200
- Around 19% higher core clock speed: 1046 MHz vs 876 MHz
- 3.2x more texture fill rate: 44.96 GTexel / s vs 14.02 GTexel / s
- 3.3x more pipelines: 640 vs 192
- 4.3x better floating-point performance: 1,439 gflops vs 336.4 gflops
- 4096x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB / 2 GB
- 2.8x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1782 MHz
- 4.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3572 vs 733
- Around 90% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 548 vs 288
- 6.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12020 vs 1843
- 6.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 40.695 vs 6
- 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 588.094 vs 186.605
- 7.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.205 vs 0.433
- 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.455 vs 10.365
- 9.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 166.26 vs 17.75
- 4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4921 vs 1245
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1577 vs 598
- Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1671 vs 1241
- 4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4921 vs 1245
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1577 vs 598
- Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1671 vs 1241
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1046 MHz vs 876 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 44.96 GTexel / s vs 14.02 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 640 vs 192 |
Floating-point performance | 1,439 gflops vs 336.4 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB / 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 1782 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3572 vs 733 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 548 vs 288 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12020 vs 1843 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 40.695 vs 6 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 588.094 vs 186.605 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.205 vs 0.433 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.455 vs 10.365 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 166.26 vs 17.75 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4921 vs 1245 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1577 vs 598 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1671 vs 1241 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4921 vs 1245 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1577 vs 598 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1671 vs 1241 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K420
- Around 66% lower typical power consumption: 41 Watt vs 68 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 41 Watt vs 68 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K2200
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K420
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro K2200 | NVIDIA Quadro K420 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3572 | 733 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 548 | 288 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12020 | 1843 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 40.695 | 6 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 588.094 | 186.605 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.205 | 0.433 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.455 | 10.365 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 166.26 | 17.75 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4921 | 1245 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1577 | 598 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1671 | 1241 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4921 | 1245 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1577 | 598 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1671 | 1241 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1193 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro K2200 | NVIDIA Quadro K420 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
Code name | GM107 | GK107 |
Launch date | 22 July 2014 | 22 July 2014 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $395.75 | $96.67 |
Place in performance rating | 787 | 1467 |
Price now | $343.99 | $89.99 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 13.01 | 10.27 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1046 MHz | 876 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,439 gflops | 336.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 192 |
Texture fill rate | 44.96 GTexel / s | 14.02 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 68 Watt | 41 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 1,270 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | DVI-I DP, 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort |
Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 202 mm | 160 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Width | 1" (2.5 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Shader Model | 5 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB / 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 80.19 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 1782 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | 128 Bit |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Desktop Management |