NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs NVIDIA Quadro K420

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K2200 and NVIDIA Quadro K420 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2200

  • Around 19% higher core clock speed: 1046 MHz vs 876 MHz
  • 3.2x more texture fill rate: 44.96 GTexel / s vs 14.02 GTexel / s
  • 3.3x more pipelines: 640 vs 192
  • 4.3x better floating-point performance: 1,439 gflops vs 336.4 gflops
  • 4096x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB / 2 GB
  • 2.8x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1782 MHz
  • 4.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3572 vs 733
  • Around 90% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 548 vs 288
  • 6.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12020 vs 1843
  • 6.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 40.695 vs 6
  • 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 588.094 vs 186.605
  • 7.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.205 vs 0.433
  • 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.455 vs 10.365
  • 9.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 166.26 vs 17.75
  • 4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4921 vs 1245
  • 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1577 vs 598
  • Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1671 vs 1241
  • 4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4921 vs 1245
  • 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1577 vs 598
  • Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1671 vs 1241
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1046 MHz vs 876 MHz
Texture fill rate 44.96 GTexel / s vs 14.02 GTexel / s
Pipelines 640 vs 192
Floating-point performance 1,439 gflops vs 336.4 gflops
Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 1 GB / 2 GB
Memory clock speed 5012 MHz vs 1782 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 3572 vs 733
PassMark - G2D Mark 548 vs 288
Geekbench - OpenCL 12020 vs 1843
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 40.695 vs 6
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 588.094 vs 186.605
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.205 vs 0.433
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 30.455 vs 10.365
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 166.26 vs 17.75
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 4921 vs 1245
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1577 vs 598
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1671 vs 1241
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 4921 vs 1245
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1577 vs 598
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1671 vs 1241

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K420

  • Around 66% lower typical power consumption: 41 Watt vs 68 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 41 Watt vs 68 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K2200
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K420

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
3572
733
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
548
288
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
12020
1843
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
40.695
6
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
588.094
186.605
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3.205
0.433
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
30.455
10.365
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
166.26
17.75
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
4921
1245
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1577
598
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1671
1241
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
4921
1245
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1577
598
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1671
1241
Name NVIDIA Quadro K2200 NVIDIA Quadro K420
PassMark - G3D Mark 3572 733
PassMark - G2D Mark 548 288
Geekbench - OpenCL 12020 1843
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 40.695 6
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 588.094 186.605
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.205 0.433
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 30.455 10.365
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 166.26 17.75
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 4921 1245
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1577 598
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1671 1241
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 4921 1245
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1577 598
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1671 1241
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 1193

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro K2200 NVIDIA Quadro K420

Essentials

Architecture Maxwell Kepler
Code name GM107 GK107
Launch date 22 July 2014 22 July 2014
Launch price (MSRP) $395.75 $96.67
Place in performance rating 787 1467
Price now $343.99 $89.99
Type Workstation Workstation
Value for money (0-100) 13.01 10.27

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1124 MHz
Core clock speed 1046 MHz 876 MHz
Floating-point performance 1,439 gflops 336.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 640 192
Texture fill rate 44.96 GTexel / s 14.02 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 68 Watt 41 Watt
Transistor count 1,870 million 1,270 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort DVI-I DP, 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort
Number of simultaneous displays 4

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Length 202 mm 160 mm
Supplementary power connectors None None
Width 1" (2.5 cm)

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 12
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
Vulkan
Shader Model 5

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 1 GB / 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 80.19 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 5012 MHz 1782 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 128 Bit

Technologies

3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Desktop Management