NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs NVIDIA Quadro K420
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA Quadro K2200 und NVIDIA Quadro K420 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA Quadro K2200
- Etwa 19% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1046 MHz vs 876 MHz
- 3.2x mehr Texturfüllrate: 44.96 GTexel / s vs 14.02 GTexel / s
- 3.3x mehr Leitungssysteme: 640 vs 192
- 4.3x bessere Gleitkomma-Leistung: 1,439 gflops vs 336.4 gflops
- 4096x mehr maximale Speichergröße: 4 GB vs 1 GB / 2 GB
- 2.8x mehr Speichertaktfrequenz: 5012 MHz vs 1782 MHz
- 4.9x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3572 vs 733
- Etwa 90% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 548 vs 288
- 6.5x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12020 vs 1843
- 6.8x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 40.695 vs 6
- 3.2x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 588.094 vs 186.605
- 7.4x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.205 vs 0.433
- 2.9x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.455 vs 10.365
- 9.4x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 166.26 vs 17.75
- 4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4921 vs 1245
- 2.6x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1577 vs 598
- Etwa 35% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1671 vs 1241
- 4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4921 vs 1245
- 2.6x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1577 vs 598
- Etwa 35% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1671 vs 1241
Spezifikationen | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1046 MHz vs 876 MHz |
Texturfüllrate | 44.96 GTexel / s vs 14.02 GTexel / s |
Leitungssysteme | 640 vs 192 |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 1,439 gflops vs 336.4 gflops |
Maximale Speichergröße | 4 GB vs 1 GB / 2 GB |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 5012 MHz vs 1782 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3572 vs 733 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 548 vs 288 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12020 vs 1843 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 40.695 vs 6 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 588.094 vs 186.605 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.205 vs 0.433 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.455 vs 10.365 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 166.26 vs 17.75 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4921 vs 1245 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1577 vs 598 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1671 vs 1241 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4921 vs 1245 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1577 vs 598 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1671 vs 1241 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA Quadro K420
- Etwa 66% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 41 Watt vs 68 Watt
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 41 Watt vs 68 Watt |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K2200
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K420
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro K2200 | NVIDIA Quadro K420 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3572 | 733 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 548 | 288 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12020 | 1843 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 40.695 | 6 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 588.094 | 186.605 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.205 | 0.433 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.455 | 10.365 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 166.26 | 17.75 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4921 | 1245 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1577 | 598 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1671 | 1241 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4921 | 1245 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1577 | 598 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1671 | 1241 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1193 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA Quadro K2200 | NVIDIA Quadro K420 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Maxwell | Kepler |
Codename | GM107 | GK107 |
Startdatum | 22 July 2014 | 22 July 2014 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $395.75 | $96.67 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 787 | 1467 |
Jetzt kaufen | $343.99 | $89.99 |
Typ | Workstation | Workstation |
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 13.01 | 10.27 |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1124 MHz | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1046 MHz | 876 MHz |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 1,439 gflops | 336.4 gflops |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Leitungssysteme | 640 | 192 |
Texturfüllrate | 44.96 GTexel / s | 14.02 GTexel / s |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 68 Watt | 41 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 1,870 million | 1,270 million |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | DVI-I DP, 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort |
Anzahl der gleichzeitigen Anzeigen | 4 | |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Schnittstelle | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Länge | 202 mm | 160 mm |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | None | None |
Breite | 1" (2.5 cm) | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Shader Model | 5 | |
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 4 GB | 1 GB / 2 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 80.19 GB / s | |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 5012 MHz | 1782 MHz |
Speichertyp | GDDR5 | 128 Bit |
Technologien |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Desktop Management |