NVIDIA Quadro K2200 versus NVIDIA Quadro K420

Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro K2200 and NVIDIA Quadro K420 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro K2200

versus

NVIDIA Quadro K420

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K2200

Environ 19% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1046 MHz versus 876 MHz
times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 44.96 GTexel / s versus 14.02 GTexel / s
3.3x plus de pipelines: 640 versus 192
4.3x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,439 gflops versus 336.4 gflops
4096x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 1 GB / 2 GB
2.8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5012 MHz versus 1782 MHz
4.9x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3572 versus 733
Environ 90% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 548 versus 288
6.5x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 12020 versus 1843
6.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 40.695 versus 6
3.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 588.094 versus 186.605
7.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.205 versus 0.433
2.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.455 versus 10.365
9.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 166.26 versus 17.75
4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4921 versus 1245
2.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1577 versus 598
Environ 35% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1671 versus 1241
4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4921 versus 1245
2.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1577 versus 598
Environ 35% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1671 versus 1241

Caractéristiques
Vitesse du noyau	1046 MHz versus 876 MHz
Taux de remplissage de la texture	44.96 GTexel / s versus 14.02 GTexel / s
Pipelines	640 versus 192
Performance á point flottant	1,439 gflops versus 336.4 gflops
Taille de mémore maximale	4 GB versus 1 GB / 2 GB
Vitesse de mémoire	5012 MHz versus 1782 MHz
Référence
PassMark - G3D Mark	3572 versus 733
PassMark - G2D Mark	548 versus 288
Geekbench - OpenCL	12020 versus 1843
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	40.695 versus 6
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	588.094 versus 186.605
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.205 versus 0.433
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	30.455 versus 10.365
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	166.26 versus 17.75
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4921 versus 1245
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1577 versus 598
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1671 versus 1241
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4921 versus 1245
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1577 versus 598
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1671 versus 1241

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K420

Environ 66% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 41 Watt versus 68 Watt

Thermal Design Power (TDP)	41 Watt versus 68 Watt

Comparer les références

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K2200
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K420

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

3572

733

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

548

288

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

12020

1843

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

40.695

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

588.094

186.605

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3.205

0.433

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

30.455

10.365

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

166.26

17.75

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4921

1245

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1577

598

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1671

1241

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4921

1245

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1577

598

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1671

1241

Nom	NVIDIA Quadro K2200	NVIDIA Quadro K420
PassMark - G3D Mark	3572	733
PassMark - G2D Mark	548	288
Geekbench - OpenCL	12020	1843
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	40.695	6
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	588.094	186.605
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.205	0.433
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	30.455	10.365
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	166.26	17.75
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4921	1245
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1577	598
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1671	1241
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4921	1245
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1577	598
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1671	1241
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	1193

Comparer les caractéristiques

	NVIDIA Quadro K2200	NVIDIA Quadro K420
Essentiel
Architecture	Maxwell	Kepler
Nom de code	GM107	GK107
Date de sortie	22 July 2014	22 July 2014
Prix de sortie (MSRP)	$395.75	$96.67
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance	787	1467
Prix maintenant	$343.99	$89.99
Genre	Workstation	Workstation
Valeur pour le prix (0-100)	13.01	10.27
Infos techniques
Vitesse augmenté	1124 MHz
Vitesse du noyau	1046 MHz	876 MHz
Performance á point flottant	1,439 gflops	336.4 gflops
Processus de fabrication	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	640	192
Taux de remplissage de la texture	44.96 GTexel / s	14.02 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	68 Watt	41 Watt
Compte de transistor	1,870 million	1,270 million
Sorties et ports de vidéo
Connecteurs d’écran	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort	DVI-I DP, 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort
Nombre d’écrans á la fois		4
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Longeur	202 mm	160 mm
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires	None	None
Largeur		1" (2.5 cm)
Soutien API
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	12
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Vulkan
Shader Model		5
Mémoire
RAM maximale	4 GB	1 GB / 2 GB
Bande passante de la mémoire	80.19 GB / s
Largeur du bus mémoire	128 Bit	128 Bit
Vitesse de mémoire	5012 MHz	1782 MHz
Genre de mémoire	GDDR5	128 Bit
Technologies
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Desktop Management