NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs NVIDIA Quadro K620

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K2200 and NVIDIA Quadro K620 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro K2200

NVIDIA Quadro K620

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2200

2.5x more texture fill rate: 44.96 GTexel / s vs 17.98 GTexel / s
Around 67% higher pipelines: 640 vs 384
Around 67% better floating-point performance: 1,439 gflops vs 863.2 gflops
2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
2.8x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1800 MHz
Around 61% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3572 vs 2220
Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 548 vs 480
Around 75% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12020 vs 6869
Around 84% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 40.695 vs 22.112
Around 98% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 588.094 vs 297.631
2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.205 vs 1.427
Around 98% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.455 vs 15.363
Around 68% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 166.26 vs 99.125
Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4921 vs 2970
Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4921 vs 2970
Around 70% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1193 vs 702

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	44.96 GTexel / s vs 17.98 GTexel / s
Pipelines	640 vs 384
Floating-point performance	1,439 gflops vs 863.2 gflops
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 2 GB
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz vs 1800 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	3572 vs 2220
PassMark - G2D Mark	548 vs 480
Geekbench - OpenCL	12020 vs 6869
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	40.695 vs 22.112
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	588.094 vs 297.631
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.205 vs 1.427
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	30.455 vs 15.363
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	166.26 vs 99.125
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4921 vs 2970
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4921 vs 2970
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	1193 vs 702

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K620

Around 1% higher core clock speed: 1058 MHz vs 1046 MHz
Around 66% lower typical power consumption: 41 Watt vs 68 Watt
Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2490 vs 1577
Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3329 vs 1671
Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2490 vs 1577
Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3329 vs 1671

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1058 MHz vs 1046 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	41 Watt vs 68 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2490 vs 1577
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3329 vs 1671
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2490 vs 1577
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3329 vs 1671

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K2200
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K620

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

3572

2220

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

548

480

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

12020

6869

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

40.695

22.112

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

588.094

297.631

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3.205

1.427

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

30.455

15.363

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

166.26

99.125

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4921

2970

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1577

2490

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1671

3329

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4921

2970

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1577

2490

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1671

3329

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

1193

702

Name	NVIDIA Quadro K2200	NVIDIA Quadro K620
PassMark - G3D Mark	3572	2220
PassMark - G2D Mark	548	480
Geekbench - OpenCL	12020	6869
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	40.695	22.112
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	588.094	297.631
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.205	1.427
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	30.455	15.363
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	166.26	99.125
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4921	2970
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1577	2490
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1671	3329
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4921	2970
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1577	2490
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1671	3329
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	1193	702

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro K2200	NVIDIA Quadro K620
Essentials
Architecture	Maxwell	Maxwell
Code name	GM107	GM107
Launch date	22 July 2014	22 July 2014
Launch price (MSRP)	$395.75	$189.89
Place in performance rating	787	953
Price now	$343.99	$189.93
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Value for money (0-100)	13.01	15.23
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1124 MHz	1124 MHz
Core clock speed	1046 MHz	1058 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,439 gflops	863.2 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	640	384
Texture fill rate	44.96 GTexel / s	17.98 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	68 Watt	41 Watt
Transistor count	1,870 million	1,870 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort	1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, DVI-I DP
Number of simultaneous displays		4
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	202 mm	160 mm
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Width		1" (2.5 cm)
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	12
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Vulkan
Shader Model		5
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	80.19 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz	1800 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	128 Bit
Technologies
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Desktop Management