NVIDIA Quadro K2200 versus NVIDIA Quadro K620

Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro K2200 and NVIDIA Quadro K620 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro K2200

versus

NVIDIA Quadro K620

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K2200

times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 44.96 GTexel / s versus 17.98 GTexel / s
Environ 67% de pipelines plus haut: 640 versus 384
Environ 67% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,439 gflops versus 863.2 gflops
2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
2.8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5012 MHz versus 1800 MHz
Environ 61% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3572 versus 2220
Environ 14% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 548 versus 480
Environ 75% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 12020 versus 6869
Environ 84% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 40.695 versus 22.112
Environ 98% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 588.094 versus 297.631
2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.205 versus 1.427
Environ 98% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.455 versus 15.363
Environ 68% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 166.26 versus 99.125
Environ 66% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4921 versus 2970
Environ 66% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4921 versus 2970
Environ 70% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1193 versus 702

Caractéristiques
Taux de remplissage de la texture	44.96 GTexel / s versus 17.98 GTexel / s
Pipelines	640 versus 384
Performance á point flottant	1,439 gflops versus 863.2 gflops
Taille de mémore maximale	4 GB versus 2 GB
Vitesse de mémoire	5012 MHz versus 1800 MHz
Référence
PassMark - G3D Mark	3572 versus 2220
PassMark - G2D Mark	548 versus 480
Geekbench - OpenCL	12020 versus 6869
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	40.695 versus 22.112
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	588.094 versus 297.631
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.205 versus 1.427
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	30.455 versus 15.363
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	166.26 versus 99.125
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4921 versus 2970
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4921 versus 2970
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	1193 versus 702

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K620

Environ 1% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1058 MHz versus 1046 MHz
Environ 66% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 41 Watt versus 68 Watt
Environ 58% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2490 versus 1577
Environ 99% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3329 versus 1671
Environ 58% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2490 versus 1577
Environ 99% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3329 versus 1671

Caractéristiques
Vitesse du noyau	1058 MHz versus 1046 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	41 Watt versus 68 Watt
Référence
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2490 versus 1577
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3329 versus 1671
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2490 versus 1577
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3329 versus 1671

Comparer les références

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K2200
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K620

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

3572

2220

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

548

480

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

12020

6869

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

40.695

22.112

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

588.094

297.631

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3.205

1.427

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

30.455

15.363

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

166.26

99.125

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4921

2970

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1577

2490

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1671

3329

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4921

2970

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1577

2490

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1671

3329

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

1193

702

Nom	NVIDIA Quadro K2200	NVIDIA Quadro K620
PassMark - G3D Mark	3572	2220
PassMark - G2D Mark	548	480
Geekbench - OpenCL	12020	6869
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	40.695	22.112
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	588.094	297.631
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.205	1.427
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	30.455	15.363
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	166.26	99.125
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4921	2970
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1577	2490
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1671	3329
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4921	2970
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1577	2490
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1671	3329
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	1193	702

Comparer les caractéristiques

	NVIDIA Quadro K2200	NVIDIA Quadro K620
Essentiel
Architecture	Maxwell	Maxwell
Nom de code	GM107	GM107
Date de sortie	22 July 2014	22 July 2014
Prix de sortie (MSRP)	$395.75	$189.89
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance	787	953
Prix maintenant	$343.99	$189.93
Genre	Workstation	Workstation
Valeur pour le prix (0-100)	13.01	15.23
Infos techniques
Vitesse augmenté	1124 MHz	1124 MHz
Vitesse du noyau	1046 MHz	1058 MHz
Performance á point flottant	1,439 gflops	863.2 gflops
Processus de fabrication	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	640	384
Taux de remplissage de la texture	44.96 GTexel / s	17.98 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	68 Watt	41 Watt
Compte de transistor	1,870 million	1,870 million
Sorties et ports de vidéo
Connecteurs d’écran	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort	1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, DVI-I DP
Nombre d’écrans á la fois		4
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Longeur	202 mm	160 mm
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires	None	None
Largeur		1" (2.5 cm)
Soutien API
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	12
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Vulkan
Shader Model		5
Mémoire
RAM maximale	4 GB	2 GB
Bande passante de la mémoire	80.19 GB / s
Largeur du bus mémoire	128 Bit	128 Bit
Vitesse de mémoire	5012 MHz	1800 MHz
Genre de mémoire	GDDR5	128 Bit
Technologies
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Desktop Management