NVIDIA Quadro K2200M vs NVIDIA Quadro K3100M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K2200M and NVIDIA Quadro K3100M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro K2200M

NVIDIA Quadro K3100M

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2200M

Videocard is newer: launch date 0 year(s) 11 month(s) later
Around 15% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 75 Watt
Around 57% higher memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 3200 MHz
Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3501 vs 2270
Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 367 vs 323
Around 78% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10787 vs 6076
Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4750 vs 3721
Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4750 vs 3721
Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3720 vs 2502
Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3720 vs 2502
Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3084 vs 2616
Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3084 vs 2616

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	19 July 2014 vs 23 July 2013
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	65 Watt vs 75 Watt
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz vs 3200 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	3501 vs 2270
PassMark - G2D Mark	367 vs 323
Geekbench - OpenCL	10787 vs 6076
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4750 vs 3721
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4750 vs 3721
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3720 vs 2502
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3720 vs 2502
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3084 vs 2616
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3084 vs 2616

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K3100M

Around 6% higher core clock speed: 706 MHz vs 667 MHz
Around 69% higher texture fill rate: 45.18 GTexel / s vs 26.68 GTexel / s
Around 20% higher pipelines: 768 vs 640
Around 27% better floating-point performance: 1,084 gflops vs 853.8 gflops
2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB

Core clock speed	706 MHz vs 667 MHz
Texture fill rate	45.18 GTexel / s vs 26.68 GTexel / s
Pipelines	768 vs 640
Floating-point performance	1,084 gflops vs 853.8 gflops
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 2 GB

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K2200M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K3100M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

3501

2270

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

367

323

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

10787

6076

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4750

3721

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4750

3721

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3720

2502

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3720

2502

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3084

2616

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3084

2616

Name	NVIDIA Quadro K2200M	NVIDIA Quadro K3100M
PassMark - G3D Mark	3501	2270
PassMark - G2D Mark	367	323
Geekbench - OpenCL	10787	6076
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4750	3721
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4750	3721
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3720	2502
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3720	2502
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3084	2616
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3084	2616
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		19.239
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		426.305
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		1.468
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		15.251
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		38.135
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		0

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro K2200M	NVIDIA Quadro K3100M
Essentials
Architecture	Maxwell	Kepler
Code name	GM107	GK104
Launch date	19 July 2014	23 July 2013
Place in performance rating	549	1060
Type	Workstation	Mobile workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$1,999
Price now		$1,999
Value for money (0-100)		1.38
Technical info
Core clock speed	667 MHz	706 MHz
Floating-point performance	853.8 gflops	1,084 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	640	768
Texture fill rate	26.68 GTexel / s	45.18 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	65 Watt	75 Watt
Transistor count	1,870 million	3,540 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Display Port	1.2	1.2
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors	None
Laptop size		large
API support
DirectX	12	12
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
Shader Model	5	5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	80 GB / s	102.4 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz	3200 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus