NVIDIA Quadro K4000M vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5850
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K4000M and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5850 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K4000M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 20% higher core clock speed: 601 MHz vs 500 MHz
- 2.4x more texture fill rate: 48.08 GTexel / s vs 20 GTexel / s
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 960 vs 800
- Around 44% better floating-point performance: 1,154 gflops vs 800.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1903 vs 763
- Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 10.054 vs 7.457
- Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 544.601 vs 512.081
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3855 vs 1643
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4957 vs 3314
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4470 vs 3356
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3855 vs 1643
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4957 vs 3314
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4470 vs 3356
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 June 2012 vs 7 January 2010 |
Core clock speed | 601 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 48.08 GTexel / s vs 20 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 960 vs 800 |
Floating-point performance | 1,154 gflops vs 800.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1903 vs 763 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.054 vs 7.457 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 544.601 vs 512.081 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3855 vs 1643 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4957 vs 3314 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4470 vs 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3855 vs 1643 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4957 vs 3314 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4470 vs 3356 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5850
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 100 Watt
- Around 43% higher memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 2800 MHz
- Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 403 vs 296
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 100 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 2800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 403 vs 296 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K4000M
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5850
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro K4000M | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5850 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1903 | 763 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 296 | 403 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5827 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.054 | 7.457 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 544.601 | 512.081 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.46 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 22.103 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 36.553 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3855 | 1643 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4957 | 3314 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4470 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3855 | 1643 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4957 | 3314 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4470 | 3356 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro K4000M | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5850 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | GK104 | Broadway |
Launch date | 1 June 2012 | 7 January 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 851 | 853 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 601 MHz | 500 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,154 gflops | 800.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 960 | 800 |
Texture fill rate | 48.08 GTexel / s | 20 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 30 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1,040 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | large |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB / s | 64.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2800 MHz | 4000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3, GDDR3, GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
HDMI 1.3a |