NVIDIA Quadro K4000M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K4000M and NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA Quadro K4000M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 370

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K4000M

Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 8 month(s) later
Around 67% higher core clock speed: 601 MHz vs 360 MHz
16.7x more texture fill rate: 48.08 GTexel / s vs 2.88 GTexel / s
60x more pipelines: 960 vs 16
50.1x better floating-point performance: 1,154 gflops vs 23.04 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 80 nm
16x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 256 MB
2.8x more memory clock speed: 2800 MHz vs 1000 MHz
23.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1978 vs 84
7.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4470 vs 628
7.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4470 vs 628

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	1 June 2012 vs 12 September 2007
Core clock speed	601 MHz vs 360 MHz
Texture fill rate	48.08 GTexel / s vs 2.88 GTexel / s
Pipelines	960 vs 16
Floating-point performance	1,154 gflops vs 23.04 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 80 nm
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 256 MB
Memory clock speed	2800 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	1978 vs 84
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	4470 vs 628
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	4470 vs 628

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 370

2.9x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 100 Watt
Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 385 vs 301

Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	35 Watt vs 100 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	385 vs 301

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K4000M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 370

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1978

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

301

385

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4470

628

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4470

628

Name	NVIDIA Quadro K4000M	NVIDIA Quadro FX 370
PassMark - G3D Mark	1978	84
PassMark - G2D Mark	301	385
Geekbench - OpenCL	5986
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	10.054
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	544.601
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.46
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	22.103
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	36.553
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	3855
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	4957
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	4470	628
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	3855
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	4957
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	4470	628

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro K4000M	NVIDIA Quadro FX 370
Essentials
Architecture	Kepler	Tesla
Code name	GK104	G84
Launch date	1 June 2012	12 September 2007
Place in performance rating	860	861
Type	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$129
Price now		$92.75
Value for money (0-100)		1.17
Technical info
Core clock speed	601 MHz	360 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,154 gflops	23.04 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	80 nm
Pipelines	960	16
Texture fill rate	48.08 GTexel / s	2.88 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	100 Watt	35 Watt
Transistor count	3,540 million	289 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	2x DVI
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 1.0 x16
Laptop size	large
Length		198 mm
Supplementary power connectors		None
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	10.0
OpenGL	4.6	3.3
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	256 MB
Memory bandwidth	89.6 GB / s	8 GB / s
Memory bus width	256 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	2800 MHz	1000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	DDR2
Shared memory	0