NVIDIA Quadro K5100M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K5100M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- Around 22% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 122 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 44% higher memory clock speed: 3600 MHz vs 2500 MHz
- Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 15.706 vs 13.832
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6747 vs 4868
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3679
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6747 vs 4868
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3679
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 23 July 2013 vs 11 May 2013 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 122 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz vs 2500 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.706 vs 13.832 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6747 vs 4868 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 3679 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3362 vs 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6747 vs 4868 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 3679 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3362 vs 3351 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
- Around 7% higher core clock speed: 823 MHz vs 771 MHz
- Around 3% higher texture fill rate: 102.0 GTexel / s vs 98.69 GTexel / s
- Around 3% better floating-point performance: 2,448 gflops vs 2,369 gflops
- Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3804 vs 3163
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 422 vs 363
- Around 12% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12815 vs 11427
- 6.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 39.934 vs 5.972
- Around 99% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 705.616 vs 355.305
- 3.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.631 vs 1.022
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 78.867 vs 34.772
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 823 MHz vs 771 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 102.0 GTexel / s vs 98.69 GTexel / s |
| Floating-point performance | 2,448 gflops vs 2,369 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3804 vs 3163 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 422 vs 363 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12815 vs 11427 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 39.934 vs 5.972 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 705.616 vs 355.305 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.631 vs 1.022 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 78.867 vs 34.772 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro K5100M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3163 | 3804 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 363 | 422 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11427 | 12815 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.972 | 39.934 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 355.305 | 705.616 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.022 | 3.631 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.706 | 13.832 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 34.772 | 78.867 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6747 | 4868 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3679 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3362 | 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6747 | 4868 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3679 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3362 | 3351 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1466 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro K5100M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Code name | GK104 | GK104 |
| Launch date | 23 July 2013 | 11 May 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 763 | 764 |
| Price now | $309.99 | |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 13.80 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 771 MHz | 823 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 2,369 gflops | 2,448 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 1536 |
| Texture fill rate | 98.69 GTexel / s | 102.0 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 122 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 3,540 million |
| Boost clock speed | 797 MHz | |
| CUDA cores | 1536 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | ||
| HDMI | ||
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
| VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Laptop size | large | large |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
| SLI options | 1 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 API |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB / s | 160.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 2500 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
| Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Display Management | ||
| Optimus | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro K5100M with others
NVIDIAQuadro K5100M vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 4650
NVIDIAQuadro K5100M vs
ATIRadeon HD 5850
NVIDIAQuadro K5100M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780M
NVIDIAQuadro K5100M vs
NVIDIAGRID K520
NVIDIAQuadro K5100M vs
AMDRadeon R9 M470
NVIDIAQuadro K5100M vs
NVIDIAQuadro P520
