NVIDIA Quadro K5100M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K5100M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- Around 22% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 122 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 44% higher memory clock speed: 3600 MHz vs 2500 MHz
- Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 15.706 vs 13.832
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6747 vs 4868
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3679
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6747 vs 4868
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3679
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 23 July 2013 vs 11 May 2013 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 122 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz vs 2500 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.706 vs 13.832 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6747 vs 4868 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 3679 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3362 vs 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6747 vs 4868 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 3679 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3362 vs 3351 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
- Around 7% higher core clock speed: 823 MHz vs 771 MHz
- Around 3% higher texture fill rate: 102.0 GTexel / s vs 98.69 GTexel / s
- Around 3% better floating-point performance: 2,448 gflops vs 2,369 gflops
- Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3846 vs 3072
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 418 vs 366
- Around 9% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12520 vs 11520
- 6.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 39.934 vs 5.972
- Around 99% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 705.616 vs 355.305
- 3.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.631 vs 1.022
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 78.867 vs 34.772
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 823 MHz vs 771 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 102.0 GTexel / s vs 98.69 GTexel / s |
| Floating-point performance | 2,448 gflops vs 2,369 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3846 vs 3072 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 418 vs 366 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12520 vs 11520 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 39.934 vs 5.972 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 705.616 vs 355.305 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.631 vs 1.022 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 78.867 vs 34.772 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro K5100M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3072 | 3846 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 366 | 418 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11520 | 12520 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.972 | 39.934 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 355.305 | 705.616 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.022 | 3.631 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.706 | 13.832 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 34.772 | 78.867 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6747 | 4868 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3679 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3362 | 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6747 | 4868 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3679 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3362 | 3351 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1466 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro K5100M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Code name | GK104 | GK104 |
| Launch date | 23 July 2013 | 11 May 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 761 | 762 |
| Price now | $309.99 | |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 13.80 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 771 MHz | 823 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 2,369 gflops | 2,448 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 1536 |
| Texture fill rate | 98.69 GTexel / s | 102.0 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 122 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 3,540 million |
| Boost clock speed | 797 MHz | |
| CUDA cores | 1536 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | ||
| HDMI | ||
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
| VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Laptop size | large | large |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
| SLI options | 1 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 API |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB / s | 160.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 2500 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
| Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Display Management | ||
| Optimus | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro K5100M with others
NVIDIAQuadro K5100M vs
ATIMobility Radeon X1700
NVIDIAQuadro K5100M vs
ATIRadeon HD 4550
NVIDIAQuadro K5100M vs
NVIDIATesla M2070-Q
NVIDIAQuadro K5100M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780M
NVIDIAQuadro K5100M vs
NVIDIAGRID K520
NVIDIAQuadro K5100M vs
AMDRadeon 630
