NVIDIA Quadro K5100M vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K5100M and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 54% higher core clock speed: 771 MHz vs 500 MHz
- 6.2x more texture fill rate: 98.69 GTexel / s vs 16 GTexel / s
- 4.8x more pipelines: 1536 vs 320
- 7.4x better floating-point performance: 2,369 gflops vs 320.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 512 MB
- 3x more memory clock speed: 3600 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- 7.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3163 vs 401
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 363 vs 320
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3362 vs 3262
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3362 vs 3262
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 23 July 2013 vs 9 January 2009 |
Core clock speed | 771 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 98.69 GTexel / s vs 16 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1536 vs 320 |
Floating-point performance | 2,369 gflops vs 320.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3163 vs 401 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 363 vs 320 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3362 vs 3262 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3362 vs 3262 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650
- 2.9x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 100 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 100 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro K5100M | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3163 | 401 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 363 | 320 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11427 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.972 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 355.305 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.022 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.706 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 34.772 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6747 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3362 | 3262 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6747 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3362 | 3262 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro K5100M | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale |
Code name | GK104 | M96 |
Launch date | 23 July 2013 | 9 January 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 763 | 766 |
Price now | $309.99 | |
Type | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
Value for money (0-100) | 13.80 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 771 MHz | 500 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,369 gflops | 320.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 1536 | 320 |
Texture fill rate | 98.69 GTexel / s | 16 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 35 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 514 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | medium sized |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB / s | 19.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3, DDR2, DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus | ||
1x Dual-Link/Single-Link DVI | ||
1x Single-Link DVI Support (all display ports have to be supported by the laptop manufacturer) | ||
DisplayPort support up to 2560x1600 | ||
HDMI support up to 1920x1080 (both with 7.1 AC3 Audio) | ||
PCI-E 2.0 x16 | ||
Powerplay |