NVIDIA Quadro K5100M vs ATI Radeon HD 5850
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K5100M and ATI Radeon HD 5850 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 6% higher core clock speed: 771 MHz vs 725 MHz
- Around 89% higher texture fill rate: 98.69 GTexel / s vs 52.2 GTexel / s
- Around 7% higher pipelines: 1536 vs 1440
- Around 13% better floating-point performance: 2,369 gflops vs 2,088.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 51% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 151 Watt
- 8x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 58% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3118 vs 1972
- Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6747 vs 3806
- Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6747 vs 3806
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 23 July 2013 vs 30 September 2009 |
| Core clock speed | 771 MHz vs 725 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 98.69 GTexel / s vs 52.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1536 vs 1440 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,369 gflops vs 2,088.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 151 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 1 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3118 vs 1972 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6747 vs 3806 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3362 vs 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6747 vs 3806 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3362 vs 3358 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5850
- Around 11% higher memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 3600 MHz
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 401 vs 365
- 2.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 33977 vs 12294
- 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 16.467 vs 5.972
- 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1109.612 vs 355.305
- Around 51% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.541 vs 1.022
- 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 42.08 vs 15.706
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 3600 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 401 vs 365 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 33977 vs 12294 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 16.467 vs 5.972 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1109.612 vs 355.305 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.541 vs 1.022 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 42.08 vs 15.706 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5850
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro K5100M | ATI Radeon HD 5850 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3118 | 1972 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 365 | 401 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12294 | 33977 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.972 | 16.467 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 355.305 | 1109.612 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.022 | 1.541 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.706 | 42.08 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 34.772 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6747 | 3806 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3362 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6747 | 3806 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3362 | 3358 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro K5100M | ATI Radeon HD 5850 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | GK104 | Cypress |
| Launch date | 23 July 2013 | 30 September 2009 |
| Place in performance rating | 764 | 766 |
| Price now | $309.99 | |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 13.80 | |
| Design | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $299 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 771 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 2,369 gflops | 2,088.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 1440 |
| Texture fill rate | 98.69 GTexel / s | 52.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 151 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 2,154 million |
| Boost clock speed | 725 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Length | 241 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| Shader Model | 5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB / s | 128.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 4000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Display Management | ||
| Optimus | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro K5100M with others
NVIDIAQuadro K5100M vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 4650
NVIDIAQuadro K5100M vs
ATIRadeon HD 5850
NVIDIAQuadro K5100M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780M
NVIDIAQuadro K5100M vs
NVIDIAGRID K520
NVIDIAQuadro K5100M vs
AMDRadeon R9 M470
NVIDIAQuadro K5100M vs
NVIDIAQuadro P520
