NVIDIA Quadro K5100M versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro K5100M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 22% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 100 Watt versus 122 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 4 GB
- Environ 44% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 3600 MHz versus 2500 MHz
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 15.706 versus 13.832
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6747 versus 4868
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 versus 3679
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6747 versus 4868
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 versus 3679
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 23 July 2013 versus 11 May 2013 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt versus 122 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 4 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 3600 MHz versus 2500 MHz |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.706 versus 13.832 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6747 versus 4868 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 versus 3679 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3362 versus 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6747 versus 4868 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 versus 3679 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3362 versus 3351 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
- Environ 7% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 823 MHz versus 771 MHz
- Environ 3% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 102.0 GTexel / s versus 98.69 GTexel / s
- Environ 3% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,448 gflops versus 2,369 gflops
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3804 versus 3163
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 422 versus 363
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 12815 versus 11427
- 6.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 39.934 versus 5.972
- Environ 99% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 705.616 versus 355.305
- 3.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.631 versus 1.022
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 78.867 versus 34.772
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 823 MHz versus 771 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 102.0 GTexel / s versus 98.69 GTexel / s |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,448 gflops versus 2,369 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3804 versus 3163 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 422 versus 363 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12815 versus 11427 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 39.934 versus 5.972 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 705.616 versus 355.305 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.631 versus 1.022 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 78.867 versus 34.772 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Quadro K5100M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3163 | 3804 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 363 | 422 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11427 | 12815 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.972 | 39.934 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 355.305 | 705.616 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.022 | 3.631 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.706 | 13.832 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 34.772 | 78.867 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6747 | 4868 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3679 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3362 | 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6747 | 4868 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3679 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3362 | 3351 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1466 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Quadro K5100M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Nom de code | GK104 | GK104 |
| Date de sortie | 23 July 2013 | 11 May 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 763 | 764 |
| Prix maintenant | $309.99 | |
| Genre | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 13.80 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 771 MHz | 823 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,369 gflops | 2,448 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 1536 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 98.69 GTexel / s | 102.0 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 122 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 3,540 million | 3,540 million |
| Vitesse augmenté | 797 MHz | |
| Noyaux CUDA | 1536 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Taille du laptop | large | large |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Options SLI | 1 | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 API |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 115.2 GB / s | 160.0 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 3600 MHz | 2500 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
| Configuration standard de la mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Display Management | ||
| Optimus | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Quadro K5100M avec des autres
NVIDIAQuadro K5100M vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 4650
NVIDIAQuadro K5100M vs
ATIRadeon HD 5850
NVIDIAQuadro K5100M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780M
NVIDIAQuadro K5100M vs
NVIDIAGRID K520
NVIDIAQuadro K5100M vs
AMDRadeon R9 M470
NVIDIAQuadro K5100M vs
NVIDIAQuadro P520
